There are some things that we lumps of clay ultimately have to accept by faith whether or not we can ever comprehend them.
predestination
a comment about free will vs. sovereignty debate
Submitted by Joel Blest on 21 February, 2007 - 04:10.
|
|
Other recent posts
- Roderick: Why Hyperpreterism can never be systematic : When a premise, assertion or formula is put forth, the true way to test it is to push it to its conclusions. Systematically
- Andrew: The problem of an 'overrealized' eschatology (24): [I have moved this comment and the discussion attached to it from the Mark Driscoll, the church and the supremacy of Christ
- jjterbeek: Johan ter Beek : user's biography
- Mike Beidler: Mike Beidler : user's biography
- adhunt: Tony Hunt : user's biography
- enarchay: End of the age (11): I find a historically rooted interpretation of the small apocalypses to be the most satisfactory. However, there is one detail
andrewperriman.com
Blog search: 'emerging theology'
User login
Creative commons
|
Content licensed under a Creative Commons License |
Latest comments