The first and most important question we face in
asking about the meaning of Jesus’ death in Paul is: What sort of thing are we
looking for? This is necessarily a highly abbreviated analysis, but I
think that what we need to find is not the right explanatory theory to
superimpose on top of Paul’s various arguments and
metaphors (substitutionary atonement, Christus Victor,
moral influence, etc.) but the eschatological narrative that lies underneath
them. The mistake that is typically made is to isolate the cross from
the narrative context and transmute it into a singular metaphysical
event that can in principle be formulated in terms of a theory of the
atonement. This is not necessarily an illegitimate procedure, but
problems arise when these theological constructs are turned round and
used as interpretive grids for the reading of scripture.
Contradictions in the Gospels: Problems or Opportunities?
Day One: A Sir Toby's Creation Myth
A Generous Orthdoxy - Brian McLaren
The Lost World of Genesis One - John H. Walton