The work, A Brief History of Time, is an original work. It is significant because it reveals a direct connection between Genesis and the book of Revelation. It is significant because it reconciles all discrepancies found in a chronological reading of Genesis I, and it is significant because it reconciles some apparent impossibility found in the remainder of Holy Scripture. It does this through a simple understanding of the text with a consistent, systematic understanding for the meaning of key terms. There are three reasons and a premise that give this work a very weighty position regarding Truth\God’s Holy Word.
The key terms in Genesis I are understood as how Christ used them when he walked the earth, and not as how they were used by Moses. It is no coincidence that when the key terms are used in this way, a story unfolds in Genesis I about Christ’s work for the Holy Father, which is correct and complete. This proves that Jesus Christ is the Messiah and that he has claim to the Throne of God.
Through faith in Jesus Christ an understanding is found in Genesis I that delivers a message regarding Jesus’ work for His Holy Father. This understanding of Genesis I reveals the Gospel story of Jesus Christ, and, it is consistent with a Superstring/M-theory concept of the universe; a concept of multiple universes, where the space-time continuum does not begin until Day Four of the Creation.
Does anybody understand?
Re: Proof Christ Messiah
The web address for this work is: bhojc.org.
Re: Proof Christ Messiah
I know the emerging church is attempting to refrain from rationilistic simplifications and is seeking to recapture the beauty of poetry and polemic… but the article you reference is utterly incomprehensible to me. And I see no real connection between the article and superstring theory. I can truly say, I am utterly and totally confused.
-Daniel-
Re: Proof Christ Messiah
The work, A Brief History of Time, is an original work. It is significant because it reveals a direct connection between Genesis and the book of Revelation. It is significant because it reconciles all discrepancies found in a chronological reading of Genesis I, and it is significant because it reconciles some apparent impossibility found in the remainder of Holy Scripture. It does this through a simple understanding of the text with a consistent, systematic understanding for the meaning of key terms. There are three reasons and a premise that give this work a very weighty position regarding Truth\God’s Holy Word.
The key terms in Genesis I are understood as how Christ used them when he walked the earth, and not as how they were used by Moses. It is no coincidence that when the key terms are used in this way, a story unfolds in Genesis I about Christ’s work for the Holy Father, which is correct and complete. This proves that Jesus Christ is the Messiah and that he has claim to the Throne of God.
Through faith in Jesus Christ an understanding is found in Genesis I that delivers a message regarding Jesus’ work for His Holy Father. This understanding of Genesis I reveals the Gospel story of Jesus Christ, and, it is consistent with a Superstring/M-theory concept of the universe; a concept of multiple universes, where the space-time continuum does not begin until Day Four of the Creation.
Does anybody understand?
Kenneth G., Prophet
Re: Proof Christ Messiah
I am sure that the gospels support the premise but how do you know that the gospels are accurate?