All comments

Guerrilla Worship - Liverpool Flash Mob

The world has moved on.: Re: Guerrilla Worship -... (2 hours ago)

Why YOU Should Plant a Church

The world has moved on.: Re: Why YOU Should Plant a... (4 hours ago)

Contradictions in the Gospels: Problems or Opportunities?

Jacob: Re: Contradictions in the... (3 days ago)
Jacob: Re: Contradictions in the... (4 days ago)
peter wilkinson: Re: Contradictions in the... (4 days ago)

Day One: A Sir Toby's Creation Myth

john doyle: Re: Day One: A Sir Toby's... (4 days ago)

A Generous Orthdoxy - Brian McLaren

john doyle: Re: A Generous Orthdoxy - Brian... (4 days ago)

The Lost World of Genesis One - John H. Walton

john doyle: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (4 days ago)
peter wilkinson: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (4 days ago)
john doyle: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (5 days ago)
Syndicate content

5. Isaiah, Matthew and a universal metanarrative

The previous four posts have been exploring the influence of Isaiah within Matthew’s gospel, which is far more extensive than the direct quotations from Isaiah suggest, and amounts to something like a template on which the gospel is based. Isaiah’s prophetic landscape could be regarded as the very backdrop and foundation for the gospel, and its presentation of Jesus in particular. Jesus is a hugely Isaianic figure. In saying this, it must also be added that Isaiah was himself developing key themes from Israel’s history: Abraham and his legacy, an exile coming to an end, the exodus (and a new exodus mirroring but exceeding the old), the promised restoration of David’s kingdom, worldwide blessing.

This final post attempts to explore the worldwide implications of Israel’s destiny in Isaiah’s prophecy, and how this relates to the Isaianic presentation of Jesus in Matthew’s gospel. The underlying question (I hope not begging the question) will be: if Isaiah has a worldwide framework in view in his prophecy, is it possible to have a Jesus who is presented in terms any less than this?

This review of Isaiah’s influence on Matthew begins where Matthew breaks off – in the final verses of Matthew 28. Jesus’s final instructions to the disciples are: “Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you.” – Matthew 28:19. The only imperative in the original Greek here is “make disciples”, and not “Go” as we have in the translations. To this are attached three present participles: “going”, “teaching”, and “baptizing”. In other words, it is taken as read that being one of the eleven apostles entailed “going”, and that this “going” was to “all nations”. This could only have been fulfilled outside the borders of Israel. What was the basis for this assumption of a worldwide mandate?

In the first place, we need look no further than Matthew 28:19. The key phrase is “all nations” – a phrase familiar to Jews schooled in the Pentateuch and the Prophets, and very familiar to one Jew in particular – Paul. παντα τα εθνη reaches back to the very first promise made to Abraham following God’s command that he leave his own country, people and household and go to the land which God would show him. The final clause of the promise is “all peoples of the earth will be blessed through you.” – Genesis 12:3. The LXX has “peoples” as φυλαι, or ‘tribes’ here. But whenever the phrase is used again with Abraham, it is the same as in Matthew 28:19 - παντα τα εθνη, “all nations” - Genesis 18:18; 22:18; 26:18.

Whatever Israel’s history in the intervening period, the worldwide destiny of Israel is understood and repeated through this phrase in Isaiah:

Isaiah 2:2 - describes the mountain of the Lord in the last days – “all nations shall stream to it” - παντα τα εθνη

Isaiah 25:7 – “On this mountain he will destroy the shroud that enfolds all peoples and ‘the vail (AV) that is spread over all nations’ “ - παντα τα εθνη

Isaiah 43:9 describes an eschatological gathering of the nations– “All the nations gather together” - παντα τα εθνη

Isaiah 52:10 – “The Lord will lay bare his holy arm in the sight of all the nations, and all the ends of the earth will see the salvation of our God.” - παντα τα εθνη

Isaiah 61:11 – “so the sovereign Lord will make righteousness and praise spring up before all nations - παντων των εθνων”

Isaiah 66:18 – “because of their actions and imaginations I am about to come and gather all nations παντα τα εθνη and tongues and they will come and see my glory.”

To this could be added variations on the worldwide theme, such as :

Isaiah 11:10 – “In that day the Root of Jesse will stand as a banner for the peoples; the nations will rally to him”

Isaiah 12:4 - “make known among the people what he has done … let this be known to all the world.”

Isaiah 14:1-2 - “Aliens will join them and unite with the house of Jacob. Nations (people) will take them and bring them to their own place. And the house of Israel will possess the nations as menservants and maidservants in the Lord’s land.”

Isaiah 19:23-25 - “In that day Israel will be the third, along with Egypt and Assyria, a blessing on the earth.”

Isaiah 25:3, 6 - “Therefore strong peoples will honour you; cities of ruthless nations will revere you”; “On this mountain the Lord Almighty will prepare a feast of rich food for all the peoples etc” (see above for παντα τα εθνη)

Isaiah 27:6 – “In days to come, Jacob will take root, Israel will bud and
blossom and fill all the world with fruit.”

Isaiah 40:5 – “And the glory of the Lord will be revealed, and all mankind together will see it.”

Isaiah 42:6 – “I will keep you and will make you to be a covenant for the people and a light for the Gentiles, to open eyes that are blind, to free captives from prison and to release from the dungeon those who sit in darkness.”

Isaiah 49:1 – “Listen to me you islands; hear this you distant nations” (of the Lord’s servant)

Isaiah 49:5-6 – “And now the Lord says … ‘It is too small a thing for you the be my servant to restore the tribes of Jacob and bring back those of Israel I have kept. I will also make you a light to the gentiles that you may bring my salvation to the ends of the earth.”

Isaiah 49:22 – “See, I will beckon to the Gentiles, I will lift up my banner to the peoples; they will bring your sons in their arms and carry your daughters on their shoulders.”

Isaiah 54:3 - “For you will spread out to the right and to the left; your descendants (seed) will dispossess nations and settle in their desolate cities.”

Isaiah 54:5 - “the Holy One of Israel is your Redeemer; he is called the God of all the earth.”

Isaiah 55:4-5 - “See I have made him (David) a witness to the peoples, a leader and commander of the peoples. Surely you will summon nations you know not, and nations that do not know you will hasten to you, because of the Lord your God,”

Isaiah 56 – the foreigner and eunuch are to be included in temple worship on the holy mountain, and the temple to become a “house of prayer for all people” -

Isaiah 60:3 – “Nations will come to your light”

Isaiah 60:5 – “to you the riches of the nations will come.”

Isaiah 60:11 – “Your gates will always stand open … so that men may bring you the wealth of the nations”

Isaiah 60:12 – “For the nation or kingdom that will not serve you will perish”

Isaiah 61:5-6 – “Aliens will shepherd your flocks; foreigners will work your vineyards … You will feed on the wealth of the nations”

Isaiah 61:9 – “Their descendants (seed) will be known among the nations and their offspring among the peoples.”

Isaiah 62:2 – “The nations shall see your righteousness”

Isaiah 62:10 – “Pass through, pass through the gates! Prepare the way for the people. Build up, build up the highway! Remove the stones. Raise a banner for the peoples.”

Isaiah 62:11 – “The Lord has made a proclamation to the ends of the earth: ‘Say to the Daughter of Zion, See, your Saviour comes!’ “

Isaiah 66:19 – “I will send some of those who survive to the nations … They will proclaim my glory among the nations.”

Isaiah 66:23 – “”From one New Moon to another and from one Sabbath to another, all mankind will come and bow down before me,” says the Lord.

Also there are various references to Isaiah’s vision extending to the “ends of the earth” –

Isaiah 26:15 – “You have enlarged the nation, O Lord; you have enlarged the nation. You have gained glory for yourself; you have extended all the borders of the land (far unto all the ends of the earth)”

Isaiah 43:6 – “Bring my sons from afar and my daughters from the ends of the earth”

Isaiah 45:22 – “Turn to me and be saved, all you ends of the earth”

Isaiah 52:10 – “The Lord will lay bare his holy arm in the sight of all the nations, and all the ends of the earth will see the salvation of our God.”

Sometimes the worldwide vision seems to be one of assistance given by the nations to Israel’s return from exile to live inside her own borders.

Sometimes the vision seems to be simply to announce to the world something that God has done for Israel. But this cannot have been without relevance to the nations, and that God did something remarkable for one nation alone. In Isaiah, God is always the God of the entire earth. His involvement with Israel has the whole earth in view. Why be God of the whole earth, and yet do something which was of significance to Israel alone, and then tell the rest of the world about it?

It seems that what God was going to do for Israel was of relevance to the rest of the world, and that in telling the world about what God had done for Israel, there would be direct benefit for the rest of the world.

This takes us back to the promises made by God to Abraham as the very basis of Israel’s destiny. Abraham’s descendants would fill the whole earth and bring blessing to the whole earth. Isaiah reiterates the worldwide significance of the promises throughout his prophecies. But in what way or form would this be seen? How would the Lord “lay bare his holy arm in the sight of all the nations”? How would “all the ends of the earth see the salvation of our God”?

Parts of Isaiah suggest what this salvation might be. Instead of protection against the predations of physical or geographical enemies, something greater is foreshadowed. Isaiah 25:7-8 speaks of a victory over death itself –

“On this mountain he will destroy the shroud that enfolds all peoples, the sheet that covers all nations; he will swallow up death for ever. The Sovereign Lord will wipe away the tears from all faces; he will remove the disgrace of his people from all the earth.”

Various features of this passage suggest something more than language being used as metaphors for events within history which affected Israel’s fortunes as a nation. The shroud and the sheet are suggestive of the winding sheet used to wrap corpses. This sheet covers not only Israel, but “all peoples,/all nations”. The verb “swallow up” is frequently used in the OT to describe death ‘devouring’ a person. Earthquakes swallowed people up. Enemies swallowed up their foes. Here, the process is reversed – death is “swallowed up forever” by God. The idea is so striking, that Paul refers to it in 1 Corinthians 15:54, and again in 2 Corinthians 5:4 – where resurrection and life are not metaphors for victory over mortal enemies, but victory over death itself.

In Revelation 21:4, Isaiah 25:7-8 is again echoed in a picture not simply of life having overcome death, but of the advent in its completeness of a new order of things: “And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes, and there shall be no more death, heither sorrow nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain, for the former things are passed away.”

When did God “swallow up death forever” in the history of Israel? Clearly, in the death and resurrection of Jesus. If this event had relevance for the rest of the world outside Israel, there would indeed be reason for declaring it amongst the nations. But ‘death’ was never an isolated metaphysical or even biological reality for Israel, and had come to be associated with the heart of Israel’s apostasy and distancing from God. She had made a ‘covenant with death’ – Isaiah 28:15, 18 – through her faithlessness, rebellion and idolatry. God was committed to destroying this covenant with death and agreement with the grave.

The image of the suffering servant which underlies the crucifixion event is the next key which Isaiah provides for Matthew, and all the gospel crucifixion accounts. The suffering of Isaiah 53 was vicarious for Israel. But the inclusive first person plural pronoun with which the meaning and effects of the suffering are described was not limited to Israel alone, since Israel was enacting a drama which was to be, in itself, not only the means of blessing to the world, but contained in itself that very blessing. Hence Isaiah could say, in anticipation of the outcome of the servant’s suffering, “so he will sprinkle many nations” – Isaiah 52:15. The word is used of the ritual purification procedures through animal sacrifice in the temple, especially of Aaron the high priest – Exodus 29:21, and for the sin offering – Leviticus 5:9. In the same way, it is used to denote the cleansing of consciences from the guilt of sin in Hebrews 10:22. The purification was now not for Israel alone, but for the nations.

The eschatological focus of Isaiah reflects the paradox of the gospels, and of Matthew’s gospel in particular. Isaiah was caught between a belief in what God would eventually do for Israel, a small nation surrounded by larger predatory empires and only able to survive through God’s favour, and the impact that Israel would have on the world. The images of a future reversal of Israel’s fortunes are staggering through their sheer scale and improbability. Yet they serve as metaphors of what God eventually did through Jesus. In Matthew we have the seedbed in Israel’s history of what would be brought through Acts, and would be reflected in the letters, to the rest of the world. The issue would not be whether God would do it, but how he would do it. Isaiah provides the template for much of what is described about Jesus in Matthew’s gospel. It also provides the template for what that gospel would go on to accomplish, in fulfilling Israel’s destiny for the world in the promises made to Abraham. Return from exile for Israel became indistinguishable from return from a much longer and more widespread exile for the world.

Your rating: None Average: 4 (1 vote)

Comments

Re: 5. Isaiah, Matthew and a universal metanarrative

Peter, I still have reservations about your attempt to universalize salvation in Isaiah.

Abraham and the blessing of the whole earth

This takes us back to the promises made by God to Abraham as the very basis of Israel’s destiny. Abraham’s descendants would fill the whole earth and bring blessing to the whole earth. Isaiah reiterates the worldwide significance of the promises throughout his prophecies.

If that’s the case, it’s odd that in the four passages where mention is made of Abraham (29:22; 41:8; 51:2; 63:16), nothing is said about the blessing of the nations. It’s not so clear that the motif of Abraham’s descendants bringing blessing to the whole earth has shaped Isaiah’s account of the salvation of the exiled Israel.

Death is swallowed up

Various features of this passage suggest something more than language being used as metaphors for events within history which affected Israel’s fortunes as a nation.

These verses may read differently if we set them within the context of Isaiah 24-25 (again I am relying on Watt’s commentary). Chapter 24 describes the ‘curse’ of decay and death which ‘devours the land’ of Israel because of its inveterate sinfulness. In keeping with the terms of the covenant, it is a curse that is fulfilled in warfare and bloodshed, ie., in death. Chapter 25 then speaks of the restoration of the people following devastation. It is not death in general that is swallowed up, but the death and the disgrace that marked the judgment of God on his people (Watts takes the definite articles with ‘shroud’, ‘shadow’, ‘death’ and ‘disgrace’ to be significant). The passage, then, for Isaiah at least, remains part of the historical and covenantal narrative of judgment and restoration.

Isaiah 25:7 does not necessarily say that YHWH will destroy death for all the nations. It makes more sense, given the context, to read: YHWH will destroy for Israel the curse of warfare and destruction that also oppresses the other nations: the nations will continue to commit acts of violence and brutality, but God will give peace to his people as part of the restoration of the land. Notice that the LXX has a quite different sense to the Hebrew text:

Death, having prevailed, swallowed them up, and God has again taken away every tear from every face; the disgrace of the people he has taken away from all the land, for the mouth of the Lord has spoken.

Even in his use of ‘new creation’ language Isaiah does not see a final victory over death (Is. 65:17-20).

Startling the nations

Hence Isaiah could say, in anticipation of the outcome of the servant’s suffering, “so he will sprinkle many nations” – Isaiah 52:15. The word is used of the ritual purification procedures through animal sacrifice in the temple, especially of Aaron the high priest – Exodus 29:21, and for the sin offering – Leviticus 5:9. In the same way, it is used to denote the cleansing of consciences from the guilt of sin in Hebrews 10:22. The purification was now not for Israel alone, but for the nations.

I pointed out earlier that the translation ‘sprinkle’ is problematic. Yes, the word is used for the sprinkling of the blood of sacrifice, but the only other occurrence of the word in Isaiah has a quite different sense (63:3).

Also note that the verbs in Isaiah 52:15 are in the past tense (not the future as in many translations), which suggests that they go with verse 14: many were astonished at you, he has startled many nations, kings have shut their mouths….This looks rather decisive to me.

Since Isaiah 52:15 LXX has ‘many nations shall be astonished at him’, Hebrews 10:22 does not offer much support for the argument that Isaiah is thinking here of the sacrificial sprinkling of the nations. Hebrews 10:22, moreover, does not form part of an argument for the salvation of Gentiles, and it seems likely that the argument has been developed specifically for a Jewish-Christian readership.

So while God’s deliverance of Israel is described as having international repercussions, even to the extent of Gentiles participating directly in the worship of YHWH, I am still not convinced that Isaiah foresees the sort of inclusive or universal salvation of the Gentiles that you are arguing for.

Re: 5. Isaiah, Matthew and a universal metanarrative

Andrew - of the four passages you mention which refer directly to Abraham, perhaps the most important is Isaiah 51:2, which links the pursuit of righteousness with Abraham, and then goes on to develop new exodus imagery with YHWH’s ‘comfort’ of Zion - Isaiah 51:3b, 9-11, and also to link the new exodus with Israel’s worldwide destiny - “The law will go out from me; my justice will become a light to the nations. The islands will look to me and wait in hope for my arm etc” - Isaiah 51:4-6. Of the three other passages you cite, the first two use the example of Abraham as a reinforcement of YHWH’s faithfulness to Israel, which is then developed in new covenant/new exodus imagery, which elsewhere links Israel with her worldwide destiny. In Isaiah 63:16, Abraham is used unusually as a collective metaphor of Israel in her waywardness. The point you make overlooks the more frequent echoes of Abraham which I was pointing out in the “all nations” passages.

In Isaiah 25:7-8, whatever the LXX suggests, the interpretation suggested in Paul’s use of identical phraseology in the Corinthians passages needs attention, particularly since Paul adopts the Isaianic mandate of Isaiah 49:6 for his own worldwide commissioning and that of Israel - Acts 13:47, and he therefore has an understanding of the universal significance of Isaiah in view. In 1 Corinthians 15:50-56, where Paul speaks of death being “swallowed up in victory”, the context is of the last trumpet, the dead being “raised imperishable”, “the perishable” being “clothed with the imperishable” and “the mortal with immortality”. This is the resurrection at the final judgment, not Israel in the first century, where the entire world is represented, and death is universal death, not Israel’s tribulations at the hands of the nations.

The ‘limited’ interpretation of Isaiah 24-25 is itself questionable. Israel is not directly mentioned in Isaiah 24, though the imagery is to some extent applicable to Israel. But Isaiah says “So it will be on the earth and among the nations, as when an olive tree is beaten, or as when gleanings are left after the grape harvest” - Isaiah 24:13. The following verses then go on to speak of a different sound coming from the west, in the east, “in the islands of the sea, from the ends of the earth” - Isaiah 24:14-16, which provide a loop back into the worldwide context which Isaiah is constantly supplying.

In Isaiah 25, Isaiah speaks of “a feast of rich food for all peoples, a banquet of aged wine - the best of meats and the finest of wines” - Isaiah 25:6, in the verse immediately preceding the ‘death destroyed’ passage. When this is taken alongside the underlying motif of the fulfilment of the Abrahamic blessing to “all nations” in Isaiah, and the very many passages and references to Israel’s worldwide destiny in many various forms, it is difficult to frame the passage (Isaiah 25:7-8) in a purely local and limited historical way.

Re: 5. Isaiah, Matthew and a universal metanarrative

The invitation to look to Abraham in Isaiah 51:2 provides the basis for the expectation that YHWH will restore devastated Jerusalem – that he will make the wilderness of Zion like the garden of Eden. There are echoes of the exodus story in verses 9-11 (the God who parted the waters for Israel to pass through will bring the exiles home from Babylon), but the transformation of the wilderness into a garden does not come from the exodus story.

More importantly, what we have in 51:4 is not a general statement about the universal significance of Israel but the particular command that the exiles should be restored to Zion. The ‘law’ that goes out is the command, not least to the nations, that the ransomed of the Lord are to be returned to their homeland (cf. 51:11). This ‘judgment’ – that is, act of sovereign divine intervention – is a light to the nations in the sense that it demonstrates the righteousness and faithfulness of the God of Israel. So I would maintain that it is generally true in these texts that the relationship between Israel and the nations is confined to the narrative about the restoration of the exiles to Zion.

I agree that Paul sees his own mission in the light of Isaiah 49:6. But I don’t see that this takes us outside the basic Isaianic narrative in which God saves Israel and that salvation is seen to have an impact on the nations. Romans 15:8-12 makes just this argument: the Gentiles praise YHWH because of what he has done through Jesus, who became a servant to the circumcised, to save Israel from destruction.

In 1 Corinthians 15:50-56, where Paul speaks of death being “swallowed up in victory”, the context is of the last trumpet, the dead being “raised imperishable”, “the perishable” being “clothed with the imperishable” and “the mortal with immortality”. This is the resurrection at the final judgment, not Israel in the first century, where the entire world is represented, and death is universal death, not Israel’s tribulations at the hands of the nations.

As you know, I disagree with this. I think that the controlling thought here is not of a final judgment of all humanity but of the ‘resurrection’ that both literally and metaphorically defines the restoration of the people of God through Jesus. In fact, this is quite in keeping with the restricted application of Isaiah 25:8. Notice that Isaiah 25:8-9 is quite explicitly applied to the people of Israel: the ‘reproach of his people he will take away from all the land’; ‘this is our God; we have waited for him, that he might save us’. This is not a universal prospect: it is Israel’s hope.

You may be right about Isaiah 24, but if it speaks of divine judgment on the nations, this is nevertheless part of the story of Israel’s restoration. The feast for all the nations on mount Zion is part of the celebration of YHWH’s salvation of Israel – it is congruent with the vision of the nations coming to Zion to learn from the God of Israel when ‘the Lord shall have washed away the filth of the daughters of Zion and cleansed the bloodstains of Jerusalem from its midst be a spirit of judgment and by a spirit of burning’ (Is. 4:4); and with the gathering of the nations to see YHWH’s glory when the scattered Jews are brought back to Zion (66:18-21). Again, the pattern is clear: YHWH saves his people and the nations react to that salvation. Paul conceives his role as facilitating that reaction of the nations to the salvation of Israel through Jesus.

Re: 5. Isaiah, Matthew and a universal metanarrative

There’s no disagreement about Isaiah’s message in Isaiah 51:2 that God will restore Zion (not Jerusalem - the use of the alternative word needs some exploration, not least in the way it is understood in the NT). We are disagreed on how God brought about that restoration. I think your interpretation tends to be too literal; the return from exile was never completed in the literal way you imply. The new exodus was not a literal exodus like the first, and the metaphorical transformation of the wilderness into a garden is very much a feature of this new exodus.

I don’t know how you understand that 51:4 was ‘the particular command that the exiles should be restored to Zion’. The ‘law’ is the same as that in Isaiah 2:3, in which the nations stream to Zion, and the law goes out from Zion, so that “He will teach us his ways, so that we may walk in his paths”, and “He will judge between the nations and settle disputes for many peoples.” It is entirely a picture of universal salvation. This is emphasised further in 51:5, which speaks of God’s arm bringing justice “to the nations”, and “The islands will look to me and wait in hope for my arm.”

Romans 15:8 does speak of Christ being “a servant to the circumcised … so that the gentiles may glorify God”, which captures the particular/universal application of Matthew’s gospel perfectly. Romans 11:13-14 also speaks of Paul’s ministry to the gentiles to arouse his own people to envy - which echoes Isaiah as quoted by Paul in Romans 10:20, contrasting with Israel’s response in Romans 10:21. In other words, the flow is reversed; it is now the gentiles who will bring God’s message to Israel - which fulfils what had been predicted in Deuteronomy 32:21 - as quoted in Romans 10:19.

As far as I can see, your interpretation of 1 Corinthians 15:50-56 comes from a debatable understanding of Revelation 20:5b, rather than the more obvious meaning of the words in context in Corinthians, but I would need to go over your interpretation again to be sure of this.

Your final paragraph again raises the question of how Isaiah 25 is interpreted. You want a literal understanding of the first part of the description, but this does not fit with the vision of the nations in the second part coming to Zion (again not literal Jerusalem) to learn from God, or the ‘return from exile’ of Israel in Isaiah 66. These latter things simply did not happen literally as described. The rest of Isaiah provides the key to how we are to interpret them - as fufilled in Jesus.

The overall problem with your revision of what the gospel entails is the improbability of a message about YHWH’s local, historically limited dealings with Israel having any interest for the rest of the world - then or now. Not only this, but your interpretation fails to take into account the whole point of the promises to Abraham, which were to fill the world with his descendants (seed), and to bring blessing to “all nations”. It is this message which Isaiah understood, and which Paul takes up as his own mandate in Acts 13:47 (from Isaiah 49:6), which he phrases as “what the Lord has commanded us”, implying not simply himself and Barnabas, but the Jews in Pisidian Antioch who were rejecting it.

But there we go. This one, as they say, will run and run.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.