All comments

Contradictions in the Gospels: Problems or Opportunities?

Jacob: Re: Contradictions in the... (3 days ago)
Jacob: Re: Contradictions in the... (4 days ago)
peter wilkinson: Re: Contradictions in the... (4 days ago)

Day One: A Sir Toby's Creation Myth

john doyle: Re: Day One: A Sir Toby's... (4 days ago)

A Generous Orthdoxy - Brian McLaren

john doyle: Re: A Generous Orthdoxy - Brian... (4 days ago)

The Lost World of Genesis One - John H. Walton

john doyle: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (4 days ago)
peter wilkinson: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (4 days ago)
john doyle: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (5 days ago)
peter wilkinson: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (5 days ago)
john doyle: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (5 days ago)
Syndicate content

Wikiklesia Volume Two: Taking Flight

I wrote a chapter about Open Source Theology for the first Wikiklesia Project publication, Voices of the Virtual World: Participative Technology and the Ecclesial Revolution, published in 2007. A second volume has just been announced: Taking Flight: Reclaiming the Female Half of God’s Image. A Journey of Freedom and Reconciliation. It aims to explore the ‘rapidly changing perception of women in faith leadership and how their participation will shape the future church’. An open invitation has been issued to published and unpublished writers to submit proposals by May 15th. Worth thinking about, I’d say.

No votes yet

Comments

Re: Wikiklesia Volume Two: Taking Flight

Recently I happened upon this essay in which C.S. Lewis argues against opening the priesthood to women. Lewis took the masculine depiction of God in the Bible very seriously indeed:

It is painful, being a man, to have to assert the privilege, or the burden, which Christianity lays upon my own sex. I am crushingly aware how inadequate most of us are, in our actual and historical individualities, to fill the place prepared for us. But it is an old saying in the army that you salute the uniform not the wearer. Only one wearing the masculine uniform can (provisionally, and till the Parousia) represent the Lord to the Church: for we are all, corporately and individually, feminine to Him. We men may often make very bad priests. That is because we are insufficiently masculine. It is no cure to call in those who are not masculine at all.

Re: Wikiklesia Volume Two: Taking Flight

Very mischievous of you John - setting the cat amongst the feminist postmodern pigeons.

Lewis took the masculine third person pronoun very seriously indeed - but falls into the error of a grossly biological view of God’s identity - overlooking the genders as being both contained within His nature - Genesis 1:27.

He rightly highlights the metaphor of Christ as the groom (masculine), and the church as the bridegroom (feminine), but that contradicts his argument, as it would make male and female feminine in relation to Christ.

He then takes the biblical concept of the priesthood of all believers (male and female), but restricts it within the categories of his own church to a male priesthood only.

There is actually very little biblical discussion in his argument at all; it rests on tradition (seasoned with a little misogyny). He also shows the predilection for reason and syllogism which he otherwise criticises.

It’s all a question of context, isn’t it? Those churches where tradition (their own) is the most deeply rooted have the greatest problems with female church leadership. As we move forward through the Reformation, the traditions are questioned, and loosened, in the light of biblical enquiry. And so into the present day, the emerging church has the least sense of connectedness with the traditional contexts of the church in its practices, and so female leadership brings scarcely a second glance.

My older daughter, a Christian, attends a University on the South coast of England, in a town where the ‘student’ church is a branch of a new church sect which proscribes female leadership. Since the University Christian Union committee largely consists of students who attend this church, they have absorbed its standpoint on women, and forbid women to lead and teach at C.U. meetings - despite the fact that female Christian students have been far more effective leaders of the C.U. than men, and often better speakers as well. Needless to say, my daughter treats this affectation with the derision it deserves, and is involved with Christian groups which have better things to do with their time.

Anyway, what was the original post about?

Re: Wikiklesia Volume Two: Taking Flight

Yes, I was rather hoping that one or two contributors to OST might have a go at this - but they would have to be a bit more on topic. Still, as you point out, the struggle to hear women’s voices in church is not over yet. What lies at the bottom of this? Gender politics? Hermeneutics? Traditionalism? I presume that it is largely hermeneutics that is driving our South coast patriarchalism.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.