Is reality man’s master?

(Universe) All real or having an actual existence responds to occurrence of quality in real or having an actual existence. All that is real responds to it’s relationship to that which is real.

(Life forms) All assemblage of the functional activities by which the presence of the functional property is manifested responds to action or practice of observing a law of real or having an actual existence.Continuing assemblage of the functional activities in the action or practice of observing a law of real or having an actual existence.

Life forms must respond to reality by observance (senses) to continue assemblage of life forms that must respond to reality by observance.

Man in his action or practice of observing a law of real or having an actual existence seeks to reduce to subjection, compel it to obey; to break it, or tame the occurrence of quality in real or having an actual existence. Though the occurrence of quality in real or having an actual existence reduces man to subjection, compels man to obey; breaks man, and tames man.

To disclaim, disown, decline to countenance, and avoid, keep clear of or stay free from acknowledging by admission, confession, or avowal; to admit (to oneself or another). puts to the test, and tries the genuineness or qualities of the true control or authority of the quality in real or having an actual existence.

Man makes effort, to use his endeavor to do, or accomplish, in the emotions of pain, or uneasiness caused by the sense of impending danger of losing the right to, or to render oneself liable to be deprived of the power, right, or faculty of option. In the false impressions or beliefs that he can take possession of, to seize or gain, control or authority of the quality of real or having an actual existence.

It is man’s emotion which is directed to the attainment or possession of the control or authority of the quality of real or having an actual existence. That tries the genuine control or authority of the quality of real or having an actual existence. And tries that man is not the genuine controller or authority of the quality of real or having an actual existence.

Is reality man’s master? If so then why does man seek to master his master?

The will of man is to master his reality proves that there is a Master of reality and that will is truly not man’s to have, otherwise man would be able to control reality at man’s choice and free will.

What ever man has the ability to do he had to find it, first. But the ability was always there to being with. In other words it has to be real or having an actual existence to do it. And again reality is his master.

And why does man deny the Master of reality when man can make a case before Him so that reality does not master man?