The (past, present, future?) fate of Israel?
|
I’m a bit confused about a certain passage. Paul is talking about how Gentiles are grafted into the tree of Israel, but then he goes onto say: “For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in. And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob” (Rom 11:25-26). How should we interpret “all Israel” and in what sense it is used? Is Paul meaning that all Israelites that make up the nation, past, present, and future will be saved? Is he meaning a future generation? Or what? If he is indicating Israel as a nation in general, past, present, and future, then what of judgment? How will the sins of Israel be punished and how does that punishment tie in with their incorporation into New Jerusalem? Are they not punished? Then what of all the sinful Israelites that deserve punishment and without punishment remain opposed to God? Maybe the better question is: what does Paul mean by “saved?” Saved from what? |
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Comments
Re: The (past, present, future?) fate of Israel?
I have added a commentary on Romans 11:25-26. It is basically a summary of my argument in The Coming of the Son of Man (230-235).
- Login or register to post comments
- view as page
Re: The (past, present, future?) fate of Israel?
The phrase “All Israel” may be an echo of its use in the OT, where it described a gathering of Israel at a time of crisis or importance, but meaning a substantial, representative portion - not literally the whole nation (eg Judges 20:1).
In Romans 11:25, the wording of the sentence which introduces Israel is important: “And so all Israel will be saved”. “So” here is “heutos”, meaning “in this way” (Eg “God so loved the world” - John 3:16), not “so” as in “therefore” or “then”, “consequently”, “afterwards” or even “so much”.
This refers us to the process which Paul has described in Romans 11, and reflects his personal experience. The gospel had been received, in some measure, by ethnic Israel, but was increasingly rejected by them, and consequently was a means of hardening their hearts. It was being received in larger measure by the gentiles. Although a “hardening” had come on ethnic Israel, it was nevertheless not total, but only “in part” (verse 25). The process which Paul describes, then, is the stirring of ethnic Israel to jealousy (to seek that which was hers) as a result of seeing the gentiles included as the people of God and receiving the promises (verses 11-13).
This is the way (“in this way”) that “all Israel” will be saved. There may be a play on words here too; “all Israel” may mean the portion of Israel which represents the whole, or “all Israel” meaning a combination of ethnic believing Israel and gentiles who had been “grafted in”.
Incidentally, the “in-grafting” reverses the normal process of horticulture - grafting a wild olive branch (gentiles) onto a natural root (Israel).
Yet here is a mystery. Israel’s rejection brought reconciliation (with God) to the world (to the gentiles) - verse 15. Her inclusion (through the means described - a process) will mean “life from the dead”.
Paul does not explicitly say that at some future time there will be a turning to God by Israel in spectacular fashion (though this has been an interpretation by some of Romans 11). Nor does he say there will be a geographical restoration of Israel as part of such a possibility (nor is this mentioned anywhere in the NT or suggested as an expectation). But whenever a Jew turns to her messiah, it is like “life from the dead” - for that person, for the restored community to which they are added, for the world to which they become witnesses. In this way, the big OT prophecies such as Ezekiel 37 are already being fulfilled.
An “end-time” conversion of Israel is not explicit in Romans 11, and is deduced only by ambiguity from one or two other references in the NT. It is not something unambiguously declared by Paul, and receives no other support elsewhere in the NT. But Paul is unambiguous in his affirmation that through the means described, a substantial number of Israel will be included amongst those vindicated by God at the final day (which would include all the faithful of Israel’s history before Christ’s coming) - a triumphant “all Israel”, in which ethnic divisions no longer count for anything. It will be an “all Israel” in which there is only one people of God - gathered around Jesus, renewed, reconstituted and resurrected in him.
- Login or register to post comments
- view as page
Re: The (past, present, future?) fate of Israel?
Having already establish in Romans 4:13-18 and 8:14-18 that it is we, the saints, both Greek and Jew, who are the children of the promise / the children of God, Paul says in 9:6-8 that the reason that the fact the most Israelites are not being saved is not a failure of God’s word is that the Israelites who are not being saved (most Israelites) are not the Israel that is to be saved in accordance with God’s word regarding His New Covenant with the house of Israel, Paul explaining that it is not the children of the flesh (they, the Jews [non-saints]) who are these children of God (already identified as us, the saints, both Greek and Jew), but the children of the promise (already identified as us, the saints, both Greek and Jew) who are counted (not descended) for the seed that is called in Isaac to receive the promise.
Thus, Paul establishes in 9:6-8 that it is not they, the Jews (non-saints), but we, the saints, both Greek and Jew, the very ones who are in fact being saved, who are the Israel that is to be saved in accordance with God’s word regarding His New Covenant with the house of Israel. Thus, God’s word has not failed. Paul reaffirms this in 9:22-24, stating that God patiently endured the vessels of wrath (them, the Jews [non-saints]), so that He would make known His glory on the vessels of mercy (us, the saints, both Greek and Jew), whom He "called," namely, "US," both out of the Jews and out of the Gentiles. Then he summarizes in 9:30 - 10:3, stating that the "Gentiles" (the Gentile aspect of us, the saints, both Greek and Jew, the "Israel" that is being saved in accordance with God’s word in 9:6-8) are receiving in the New Covenant through faith in Christ what "Israel" (they, the Jews [non-saints]) is not receiving in the Old Covenant through the law of Moses.
Thus, in 9:6-8 and in 9:31 - 10:3 (and also in 11:7-11), Paul establishes two different Israels, a saved/believing Israel (us, the saints, both Greek and Jew, the vessels of mercy) and an unsaved/unbelieving Israel (them, the Jews [non-saints], the vessels of wrath).
These two Israels in 9:6-8 and in 9:31 - 10:3 (and also in 11:7-11) are the two parts of Israel described in 11:25, which are analogized as the two parts of the cultivated tree in 11:16-24. As Paul says in 11:16-24/11:25, part of the tree/Israel does not believe in Christ, and thus is separate and distinct from the part of the tree/Israel that believes in Him, until the Gentiles enter into the part of the tree/Israel that believes in Him, after which the unbelieving/separate part of the tree/Israel can likewise believe in Him and enter into the part of the tree/Israel that believes in Him. These two parts of the tree/Israel, the unbelieving part (they, the Jews [non-saints]) and the believing part (we, the saints, both Greek and Jew), are the two Israels in 9:31 - 10:3 and 11:7-11 (unbelieving Israel / they, the Jews [non-saints]) and in 9:6-8 (believing Israel / we, the saints, both Greek and Jew).
Then Paul says in 11:26 that it is in this manner (in this stated sequence) that all Israel (all three parts: the believing part, the entering Gentile part, and the subsequently entering no-longer-unbelieving part) is to be saved (is to believe in Christ). Nowhere does Paul suggest that there will be a separate salvation for a future generation of the Jews or that there will be vessels of mercy other than "us." He specifically says that they (the Jews, [non-saints] will have to believe in Christ and be engrafted together with "us" (the saints, both Greek and Jew) in the believing part of the tree/Israel (9:6-8) in order to be saved. "They" will have to become "us," just as everyone who would be saved must do.
Paul describes only one saved group. "We" are it. "We," the saints, both Greek and Jew, are the saved, New Covenant "Israel" (9:6-8 and 11:26) predicted by Jeremiah. God’s word has not failed. That’s why Paul says in Ephesians 2:12 that the Gentile saints at Ephesus used to be, as unbelievers (but are no longer, as believers), (1) without Christ, (2) excluded from the citizenship of Israel (New Covenant Israel, whose citizens are the saints [we], both Greek and Jew), and strangers from the covenants of the promise (the promise of the Abrahamic Covenant being realized in the New Covenant).
- Login or register to post comments
- view as page

Why YOU Should Plant a Church
Contradictions in the Gospels: Problems or Opportunities?
Day One: A Sir Toby's Creation Myth
A Generous Orthdoxy - Brian McLaren
The Lost World of Genesis One - John H. Walton