A Pneumatology for the Emerging Church?
|
Understood that this site is in hopes to construct a working theology for the Emerging Church, I am a tad bit disappointed that there are not more articles discussing the Emergent stance toward a Charismatic Theology. It would seem only rational that a Charismatic Theology for the Emerging Church would be borderline foundational in light of the last one hundred years of the Church. “The Post-Eschatological Charismatic” thread comes very close to discussing such an issue. However, it at points deviates from the topic at hand. My question then is pneumatological: “What is the role of the Holy Spirit, both in the life of the individual believer and the community, in this Emergent Movement?” “Does the Emerging Church want to build upon a Charismatic Theology or reject the Charismatic understanding found within much of Evangelicalism?” I really am curious to know. I think this is an important issue to be discussed on this site. Again, the more I am involved in the Emergent Discussion the more I wonder about the reality of the Spirit within the life of this “church.” Simply put, there is more discussion on menial topics instead of on the Eschatological promise of the Spirit; a true Charismatic Theology. The French |
Comments
Rethinking pneumatology
Like samlcarr, I think it would help if you could give us a better idea of what you’re driving at. What do you mean when you say, ‘It would seem only rational that a Charismatic Theology for the Emerging Church would be borderline foundational in light of the last one hundred years of the Church’?
In the meantime I have some comments with regard to the apparent lack of interest in the charismatic theology in the emerging church, though I may be repeating myself from the previous thread.
i) The emerging church has hesitated to develop a charismatic or pneumatological self-awareness for the simple reason that many within it have either left the charismatic movement or never liked it in the first place. There is an understandable reluctance to revert to something that for all sorts of reasons has been experienced as, or judged to be, a defective form of Christianity. This is not necessarily a rejection of the belief that God works powerfully in his people through the Spirit - it is simply that people need to gain some distance from the particular religious culture through which the belief has been expressed in the last few decades.
ii) I personally think that, for all our failings, the Spirit is powerfully at work in the emerging church doing a work of renewal - not least of intellectual and theological renewal. It doesn’t look like old time revivalism or the Toronto blessing, but so what? God knows what his people needs.
iii) I think that the emerging church is - perhaps without always realizing it! - groping its way towards a broader understanding of the nature of the Spirit’s presence in the community. In Christian Associates we are having a forum in October on the following question:
If the Spirit of God is renewing the fulness of our humanity towards a new creation, what does this mean for the life of the imagination, and what part does the imagination play in the life of missional communities?
It is probably fair to say that the work of the Spirit in the ministry of the church has too often been restricted in our understanding to a rather narrow range of ‘religious’ activities, many of them associated with speaking, such as prophecy, tongues, preaching, prayer, etc. Increasingly, though, the church is seeking to express itself and engage with society in more imaginative and creative ways. What are we to make of these developments? In what ways can we celebrate the creativity of God in our communities?
This is not particularly approached from an emerging church perspective, but I think it does reflect current uncertainty about how we integrate a charismatic theology into the wider creational and creative agenda.
Is the Holy Spirit particular?
I am speaking as one with many Charismatic friends but I personally have not had a similar experience so I am necessarily an outsider. It seems to me that part of the problem for a more universal acceptance is that the essentially Charismatic experience is simply not a universal one. You say that “These realities (prophecy, word of wisdom, miracles, etc…), … are, I believe, essential for the Charismatic life of the church” and that is the very heart of the issue for me.
I have worshipped in large churches where there were also a significant number of Charismatic believers and have witnessed participation during services with expressions of speaking in tongues and prophecies. I have also personally participated in healing ministries. The very particularity of the experience that others are having is very interesting but does not seem to result in greater fellowship especially when the response afterwards is something like “what, you didn’t feel the Spirit moving?”
Likewise, for my Charismatic brothers and sisters, the “standard” worship services were unsatisfactory and they usually ended up getting together with other like-minded believers to worship more in ways that allowed the completely free expression of the Spirit. i have been a frequent visitor to these special services too but with no noticeable improvement in the ‘result’.
Live to serve : Serve to live
sharing the treasure
The whole idea of OST is that persons such as you, who have something to share on a particular area of interest would do so, so that all can learn and interact on the issues that you raise.
I pray that the Holy Spirit will work out his purpose through the emergent church, making us real witnesses in word, community and life to our Lord and Saviour. I pray that we will be open to His leading and obedient to His call.
From what I can see, there are many post-charismatics and post-evangelicals too in the emerging movement along with many other flavours too. The implication that I get from your post (perhaps mistakenly!) is that you would be happier to see the emergent church embrace a charismatic understanding and are perhaps waiting to see if it does swing that way?
Please do also explain why the thread that you referred to only “comes very close” to discussing your concerns and what you are going to do about it!
Live to serve : Serve to live