In the same way? "All"
A 'Lamb'-centred atonement theory By: john (34 replies) 16 January, 2005 - 23:22
- God's Accountability By: Dissident Heart (25/01/2005 - 00:19)
- God's accountability By: peter wilkinson (25/01/2005 - 17:48)
- Divine Complicity By: Dissident Heart (25/01/2005 - 19:40)
- Divine Dissidence? By: john (25/01/2005 - 21:36)
- God in the Dock By: Dissident Heart (25/01/2005 - 22:41)
- offended by God? By: john (26/01/2005 - 17:16)
- Cross Communique By: Dissident Heart (27/01/2005 - 19:48)
- bravo! By: john (27/01/2005 - 20:13)
- cross purposes By: peter wilkinson (28/01/2005 - 12:20)
- To the extent that OST is the By: Chris (28/01/2005 - 17:38)
- Out of the box By: peter wilkinson (28/01/2005 - 19:31)
- cross examinations By: deacon (31/01/2005 - 01:54)
- the paradox of sin By: john (31/01/2005 - 09:24)
- Romin' around By: deacon (31/01/2005 - 19:24)
- whirlpool warning... By: john (31/01/2005 - 21:27)
- Swirling around the plughole By: deacon (01/02/2005 - 18:34)
- whirlpool warning... By: john (31/01/2005 - 21:27)
- In the same way? "All" By: Chris (31/01/2005 - 10:11)
- Romin' around By: deacon (31/01/2005 - 19:24)
- the paradox of sin By: john (31/01/2005 - 09:24)
- cross examinations By: deacon (31/01/2005 - 01:54)
- Out of the box By: peter wilkinson (28/01/2005 - 19:31)
- thinking a-cross boundary lines By: john (28/01/2005 - 13:51)
- To the extent that OST is the By: Chris (28/01/2005 - 17:38)
- cross purposes By: peter wilkinson (28/01/2005 - 12:20)
- bravo! By: john (27/01/2005 - 20:13)
- Cross Communique By: Dissident Heart (27/01/2005 - 19:48)
- Divine accountability - cyber thought police? By: peter wilkinson (26/01/2005 - 10:46)
- get out the thumb screws! By: john (26/01/2005 - 17:30)
- Are pain and suffering always evil? By: Chris (26/01/2005 - 15:34)
- Dreading the judge By: Albannach (26/01/2005 - 15:16)
- Memo from the Grand Inquisitor General: By: Alario (28/01/2005 - 20:31)
- gloriously off topic... but welcome to the party By: john (26/01/2005 - 15:39)
- It's a fair cop By: Albannach (26/01/2005 - 16:00)
- offended by God? By: john (26/01/2005 - 17:16)
- God in the Dock By: Dissident Heart (25/01/2005 - 22:41)
- Divine Dissidence? By: john (25/01/2005 - 21:36)
- Divine Complicity By: Dissident Heart (25/01/2005 - 19:40)
- God's accountability By: peter wilkinson (25/01/2005 - 17:48)
- Many thanks for sharing your By: kit (23/01/2005 - 12:23)
- Didn't God always plan to sacrifice Jesus? By: Chris (17/01/2005 - 09:55)
- a whirlpool... ok let's investigate it By: john (18/01/2005 - 20:43)
- "Plan" as opposed to "purpose" By: Chris (19/01/2005 - 09:41)
- planning to fail? By: john (19/01/2005 - 12:50)
- Powerful plan and assured purpose in harmony, yet distinct By: Chris (20/01/2005 - 12:10)
- Intersections By: Alario (21/01/2005 - 03:59)
- but God's an Englishmen isn't he, Alario? By: john (21/01/2005 - 11:16)
- Quite! By: Alario (21/01/2005 - 19:57)
- but God's an Englishmen isn't he, Alario? By: john (21/01/2005 - 11:16)
- Intersections By: Alario (21/01/2005 - 03:59)
- Powerful plan and assured purpose in harmony, yet distinct By: Chris (20/01/2005 - 12:10)
- planning to fail? By: john (19/01/2005 - 12:50)
- "Plan" as opposed to "purpose" By: Chris (19/01/2005 - 09:41)
- a whirlpool... ok let's investigate it By: john (18/01/2005 - 20:43)
In the same way? "All"
Here’s the problem I have with using this passage to establish some form of original sin: the logic used would seem to imply that through Jesus all men will be saved (see especially v. 18). Paul uses the words “many” and “all” to describe both those who are condemned and those who are justified. On what basis, then, is this chapter a support for the idea that “all men” (literally understood) are under condemnation to death for sin, but not “all men” will be acquitted and enjoy eternal life?