To the extent that OST is the

To the extent that OST is the

To the extent that OST is the product of Bible-believing Christians, then it will be grounded in Scripture. To the extent that the broader culture is engaged, unbiblical and even antibiblical perspectives are going to be entertained. I’m not sure how a tendency to point out that our culture’s thinking is unbiblical is going to encourage representatives of that culture to participate in the dialogue.

Does the church have to honestly deal with our culture’s understanding of the cross? Or is it sufficient to disregard such hindrances to discipleship on the grounds that they are not anchored in the Bible?

Further, I believe D/H does try to ground his/her thinking in Scripture, but s/he may not share the same hermeneutic as many others of us; as I understand it, D/H is arguing that Scripture must be interpreted through the Great Command—love.

A 'Lamb'-centred atonement theory By: john (34 replies) 16 January, 2005 - 23:22