Re: The Sir Toby correspondence
The Sir Toby Chronicles By: peter wilkinson (27 replies) 3 March, 2009 - 17:34
- Redivivus? By: john doyle (24/04/2009 - 13:22)
- Re: Redivivus? By: peter wilkinson (05/05/2009 - 19:30)
- Re: Redivivus? By: john doyle (05/05/2009 - 22:46)
- Re: Redivivus? By: peter wilkinson (06/05/2009 - 09:54)
- Re: Redivivus? By: Andrew (06/05/2009 - 12:10)
- Re: Redivivus? By: john doyle (06/05/2009 - 21:55)
- Re: Redivivus? By: Andrew (06/05/2009 - 12:10)
- Re: Redivivus? By: peter wilkinson (06/05/2009 - 09:54)
- Re: Redivivus? By: Araslyn (05/05/2009 - 19:57)
- Re: Redivivus? By: john doyle (05/05/2009 - 22:47)
- Re: Redivivus? By: john doyle (05/05/2009 - 22:46)
- Re: Redivivus? By: peter wilkinson (05/05/2009 - 19:30)
- The Sir Toby correspondence By: john doyle (09/04/2009 - 14:04)
- Re: The Sir Toby correspondence By: john doyle (15/04/2009 - 03:53)
- Re: The Sir Toby correspondence By: shiert (15/04/2009 - 05:53)
- Re: The Sir Toby correspondence By: john doyle (15/04/2009 - 16:36)
- Re: The Sir Toby correspondence By: shiert (17/04/2009 - 01:21)
- Re: The Sir Toby correspondence By: john doyle (19/04/2009 - 19:18)
- Re: The Sir Toby correspondence By: Desert Reign (24/04/2009 - 22:47)
- Re: The Sir Toby correspondence By: john doyle (25/04/2009 - 23:47)
- Re: The Sir Toby correspondence By: Desert Reign (28/04/2009 - 23:42)
- Re: The Sir Toby correspondence By: peter wilkinson (29/04/2009 - 11:00)
- Re: The Sir Toby correspondence By: john doyle (29/04/2009 - 19:23)
- Re: The Sir Toby correspondence By: john doyle (15/05/2009 - 17:50)
- Re: The Sir Toby correspondence By: john doyle (29/04/2009 - 19:23)
- Re: The Sir Toby correspondence By: peter wilkinson (29/04/2009 - 11:00)
- Re: The Sir Toby correspondence By: Desert Reign (28/04/2009 - 23:42)
- Re: The Sir Toby correspondence By: john doyle (25/04/2009 - 23:47)
- Re: The Sir Toby correspondence By: Desert Reign (24/04/2009 - 22:47)
- Re: The Sir Toby correspondence By: john doyle (19/04/2009 - 19:18)
- Re: The Sir Toby correspondence By: shiert (17/04/2009 - 01:21)
- Re: The Sir Toby correspondence By: john doyle (15/04/2009 - 16:36)
- Re: The Sir Toby correspondence By: shiert (15/04/2009 - 05:53)
- Re: The Sir Toby correspondence By: john doyle (15/04/2009 - 03:53)
- Re: The Sir Toby Chronicles By: john doyle (02/04/2009 - 16:51)
- Imaginary Preface (cont.) By: john doyle (29/03/2009 - 19:56)
- Re: Imaginary Preface (cont.) By: peter wilkinson (30/03/2009 - 11:34)
- Re: Imaginary Preface (cont.) By: john doyle (31/03/2009 - 19:41)
- Calvinist humour By: peter wilkinson (02/04/2009 - 10:29)
- Re: Imaginary Preface (cont.) By: john doyle (31/03/2009 - 19:41)
- Re: Imaginary Preface (cont.) By: peter wilkinson (30/03/2009 - 11:34)
- Re: The Sir Toby Chronicles By: john doyle (25/03/2009 - 19:28)
- Notes for an Imaginary Preface By: john doyle (16/03/2009 - 19:16)
Re: The Sir Toby correspondence
Why, it’s all about Sir Toby’s, of course. I notice, Shiert, that your comment on this thread is one of three very terse remarks you dropped into the OST mix yesterday. Are you perhaps exercising taciturnity tactically, calling attention by abrupt contrast to the chronic verbosity which seems to plague so many of us here? Or perhaps you think I’m nursing a grudge or two, inasmuch as I do recall your having previously accused me of sinful pride. Out with it, man!