Scientists and engineers working on various systems have produced computer models of evolutionary processes, which do replicate the evolutionary process. It is a good theory and no one has produced a viable alternative that would get them a job in a University.

The arguments about scarcity of evidence are a bit rich coming from people who base their arguments on words written in a book of academically questionable historical veracity and authorship, and utterly unprovable reliablity. It is interesting that despite a constant re-writing or re-telling of most Holy writtings for centuries, it is only after the emergence of classical academic rigour and early medieval science that the writing stopped, dead!

There may well be countless examples pseudo-scientific ‘proof’ of creation being regurgitated, but there are many millions of research papers published and peer-reviewed since Darwin that serve only to refine his imperfect theory, not refute it.

Please let us see an academically peer-reviewed thesis or any other research published and replicated that demonstrates creation.