All comments

Contradictions in the Gospels: Problems or Opportunities?

Jacob: Re: Contradictions in the... (1 hour ago)
peter wilkinson: Re: Contradictions in the... (3 hours ago)

Day One: A Sir Toby's Creation Myth

john doyle: Re: Day One: A Sir Toby's... (4 hours ago)

A Generous Orthdoxy - Brian McLaren

john doyle: Re: A Generous Orthdoxy - Brian... (4 hours ago)

The Lost World of Genesis One - John H. Walton

john doyle: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (4 hours ago)
peter wilkinson: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (5 hours ago)
john doyle: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (1 day ago)
peter wilkinson: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (1 day ago)
john doyle: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (1 day ago)
peter wilkinson: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (1 day ago)
Syndicate content

Re: What can an emerging theology learn from preterism?

Re: What can an emerging theology learn from preterism?

"Conversation is a game with some hard rules: say only what you mean; say it as accurately as you can; listen to and respect what the other says, however different or other; be willing to correct or defend your opinions if challenged by the conversation partner; be willing to argue if necessary, to confront if demanded, to endure necessary conflict, to change your mind if the evidence suggests it."

David Tracy. Plurality and Ambiguity, p. 19.

The problem with being part of an "ism" is that the last phrase of Tracy’s definition of a conversation almost never comes into play.

What can an emerging theology learn from preterism? By: Andrew (32 replies) 4 September, 2008 - 13:51