Re: We have to go back, but not to square one
Re: We have to go back, but not to square one
by Jet - 26/04/2008 - 03:49
Now that I’m registered, I’m anxious to tell you that this was an excellent post! When it showed up in my rss feeder, the title grabbed me right away. It’s quite bold to say “the Church should do this or that”, but it’s an important enough topic that we should try.
I love the diagrams, and the placed worth on history in general.
Thanks.
We have to go back, but not to square one By: Andrew (23 replies) 18 March, 2008 - 22:08
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: Jet (26/04/2008 - 03:49)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: Len Hjalmarson (21/04/2008 - 23:38)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: Andrew Perriman (22/04/2008 - 01:39)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: Len Hjalmarson (22/04/2008 - 19:49)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: Andrew Perriman (22/04/2008 - 01:39)
- but not to square one? By: samlcarr (22/03/2008 - 21:43)
- Jesus is not the whole story By: Andrew Perriman (24/03/2008 - 14:07)
- Re: Jesus is not the whole story By: samlcarr (24/03/2008 - 21:21)
- Re: Jesus is not the whole story By: Andrew Perriman (25/03/2008 - 11:54)
- Re: Jesus is not the whole story By: samlcarr (24/03/2008 - 21:21)
- Jesus is not the whole story By: Andrew Perriman (24/03/2008 - 14:07)
- the obligation to object By: john (20/03/2008 - 12:10)
- Re: the obligation to object By: Andrew Perriman (20/03/2008 - 19:04)
- Re: the obligation to object By: peter wilkinson (21/03/2008 - 11:11)
- Re: the obligation to object By: Andrew Perriman (20/03/2008 - 19:04)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: randplaty (19/03/2008 - 03:05)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: Andrew Perriman (19/03/2008 - 11:26)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: Jacob (18/03/2008 - 23:53)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: peter wilkinson (19/03/2008 - 00:23)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: Andrew Perriman (19/03/2008 - 10:57)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: peter wilkinson (19/03/2008 - 11:42)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: Andrew Perriman (19/03/2008 - 18:49)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: peter wilkinson (19/03/2008 - 21:47)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: Andrew Perriman (20/03/2008 - 11:57)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: peter wilkinson (19/03/2008 - 21:47)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: Andrew Perriman (19/03/2008 - 18:49)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: peter wilkinson (19/03/2008 - 11:42)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: Andrew Perriman (19/03/2008 - 10:57)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: Andrew Perriman (19/03/2008 - 00:07)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: peter wilkinson (19/03/2008 - 00:23)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: Ilana (18/03/2008 - 23:13)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: Andrew Perriman (18/03/2008 - 23:59)

Guerrilla Worship - Liverpool Flash Mob
Why YOU Should Plant a Church
Contradictions in the Gospels: Problems or Opportunities?
Day One: A Sir Toby's Creation Myth
A Generous Orthdoxy - Brian McLaren
The Lost World of Genesis One - John H. Walton