Re: Jesus and the overlapping ages
Jesus and the overlapping ages By: peter wilkinson (18 replies) 11 February, 2008 - 19:11
- Missing the historical context By: samlcarr (08/03/2008 - 23:18)
- Re: Missing the historical context By: peter wilkinson (09/03/2008 - 15:47)
- Re: Missing the historical context By: john doyle (09/03/2008 - 19:23)
- Re: Missing the historical context By: Andrew Perriman (09/03/2008 - 23:08)
- Re: Missing the historical context By: john doyle (09/03/2008 - 19:23)
- Re: Missing the historical context By: peter wilkinson (09/03/2008 - 15:47)
- Re: Jesus and the overlapping ages By: john doyle (04/03/2008 - 13:55)
- John and the overlapping "ado about nothing" By: john (05/03/2008 - 20:44)
- Re: John and the overlapping "ado about nothing" By: john doyle (06/03/2008 - 13:57)
- John and the overlapping "ado about nothing" By: john (05/03/2008 - 20:44)
- Re: Jesus and the overlapping ages By: Lloyd Dale (13/02/2008 - 04:31)
- Re: Jesus and the overlapping ages By: peter wilkinson (13/02/2008 - 14:13)
- Re: Jesus and the overlapping ages By: Lloyd Dale (20/02/2008 - 18:19)
- Re: Jesus and the overlapping ages By: peter wilkinson (21/02/2008 - 08:57)
- Re: Jesus and the overlapping ages By: john doyle (05/03/2008 - 19:11)
- Re: Jesus and the overlapping ages By: john doyle (05/03/2008 - 19:21)
- Re: Jesus and the overlapping ages By: john doyle (03/03/2008 - 20:34)
- Re: Jesus and the overlapping ages By: peter wilkinson (04/03/2008 - 12:28)
- Re: Jesus and the overlapping ages By: shiert (04/03/2008 - 05:01)
- Re: Jesus and the overlapping ages By: john doyle (05/03/2008 - 15:58)
- Re: Jesus and the overlapping ages By: shiert (05/03/2008 - 17:47)
- Re: Jesus and the overlapping ages By: john doyle (05/03/2008 - 15:58)
- Re: Jesus and the overlapping ages By: peter wilkinson (21/02/2008 - 08:57)
- Re: Jesus and the overlapping ages By: Lloyd Dale (20/02/2008 - 18:19)
- Re: Jesus and the overlapping ages By: peter wilkinson (13/02/2008 - 14:13)
Re: Jesus and the overlapping ages
ANOTHER error: apparently I inserted a correction to my prior error, as noted by Shiert, into the wrong place on the thread. So now I’ll try to move it up higher in the sequence…
Nope, it didn’t work. The failure isn’t mine but the software’s, I’m sure of it now. Can I ascribe malicious intent to this apparently mindless and machinic obfuscation. My thoughts, once so clear and cogent, have now been waylaid by error compounded upon error.
So, if by chance you’ve found yourself ensnared in this knotted thread, know this: the error correction which immediately follows this comment is erroneously placed in the wrong place on the thread. It reallly belongs higher up there, immediately preceding my first comment. Now I must flee before any further confusion traps me inside this thread, leaving me forever walking the rails trying to rejoin the disconnected trains of thought.