- graham old on Private messaging is back!
- NetherHereAfter on Emerging authority
- Andrew on Private messaging is back!
- graham old on Private messaging is back!
- Andrew on Shane Claiborne and the rich young ruler
- graham old on Shane Claiborne and the rich young ruler
- peter wilkinson on Foucault, 'the Gang of Four', and the postmoderns
- shiert on Foucault, 'the Gang of Four', and the postmoderns
- peter wilkinson on Foucault, 'the Gang of Four', and the postmoderns
- john on College professors host viewing of Expelled
- Andrew on College professors host viewing of Expelled
- john on College professors host viewing of Expelled
Re: Psalms 2 and 22 and the conversion of the whole world
Psalms 2 and 22 and the conversion of the whole world By: Andrew (4 replies) 3 March, 2008 - 13:10
- Re: Psalms 2 and 22 and the conversion of the whole world By: kesed (04/03/2008 - 03:51)
- Re: Psalms 2 and 22 and the conversion of the whole world By: Andrew Perriman (04/03/2008 - 09:59)
- Re: Psalms 2 and 22 and the conversion of the whole world By: Jacob (03/03/2008 - 15:22)
- Re: Psalms 2 and 22 and the conversion of the whole world By: Andrew Perriman (03/03/2008 - 16:34)
Re: Psalms 2 and 22 and the conversion of the whole world
It seems to me that we have to make a distinction between the idea that the creator God is sovereign over all nations and the idea that all nations, all peoples, will one day be brought into the ‘kingdom of God’.
What, then, does it mean to say that God is sovereign over all nations?
I would like to see you flesh that distinction out a bit more. It seems there would be a lot of overlap between sovereignty and kingdom, as both symbolize a process of governing some territory and people.
Secondly: Why even use the 13-14th century term "sovereign" to describe God’s relationship to the world’s nations?