All comments

Guerrilla Worship - Liverpool Flash Mob

The world has moved on.: Re: Guerrilla Worship -... (1 day ago)

Why YOU Should Plant a Church

The world has moved on.: Re: Why YOU Should Plant a... (1 day ago)

Contradictions in the Gospels: Problems or Opportunities?

Jacob: Re: Contradictions in the... (5 days ago)
Jacob: Re: Contradictions in the... (5 days ago)
peter wilkinson: Re: Contradictions in the... (5 days ago)

Day One: A Sir Toby's Creation Myth

john doyle: Re: Day One: A Sir Toby's... (5 days ago)

A Generous Orthdoxy - Brian McLaren

john doyle: Re: A Generous Orthdoxy - Brian... (5 days ago)

The Lost World of Genesis One - John H. Walton

john doyle: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (5 days ago)
peter wilkinson: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (5 days ago)
john doyle: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (6 days ago)
Syndicate content

Re: inerrancy debates

Re: inerrancy debates

The words “inerrant” and “inerrancy” are both modern words. They are extra-Biblical. But that fact hasn’t stopped people from claiming the Bible is “inerrant.”

According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the first use of the word “inerrant” had to do with astronomy and it was written in 1652.

The next uses popped up 1837. They referred to texts that are “free from error; unerring.”

In 1868 it was used in relation to the church: “Whether absolutely inerrant or not in matters of faith.”

The word “inerrancy” was first used sometime between 1818-34 in reference to books: “Absolute inerrancy is impracticable in any printed book.”

In 1865 it was used to refer to the “Ultramontane doctrine of the inerrancy of the Pope, i.e. that of his preservation from error.”

More recently, the “inerrancy” movement was championed by the Southern Baptist Association. In particular, in the 1970s, Paige Patterson and Paul Pressler began pushing the SBC toward a conservative agenda that framed the Holy Bible as an “inerrant” text.

Inerrancy debates on Mike Macon's blog By: john doyle (9 replies) 4 November, 2007 - 22:52