Re: inerrancy debates
Re: inerrancy debates
by shiert - 05/11/2007 - 15:56
Why bother? This is an inane debate. The battle has raged for centuries. No minds are likely to be changed by anything you write. It is a colossal waste of time. See, e.g., Karl Barth on the world of the Bible.
Inerrancy debates on Mike Macon's blog By: john doyle (9 replies) 4 November, 2007 - 22:52
- Re: Inerrancy debates on Mike Macon's blog By: shanemagee (05/11/2007 - 21:18)
- Re: Inerrancy debates on Mike Macon's blog By: Andrew (06/11/2007 - 19:09)
- Re: Inerrancy debates on Mike Macon's blog By: peter wilkinson (07/11/2007 - 15:00)
- Re: Inerrancy debates on Mike Macon's blog By: enarchay (08/11/2007 - 05:30)
- inerrancy and abstinence By: john doyle (07/11/2007 - 18:17)
- Re: Inerrancy debates on Mike Macon's blog By: peter wilkinson (07/11/2007 - 15:00)
- Re: Inerrancy debates on Mike Macon's blog By: Andrew (06/11/2007 - 19:09)
- Re: inerrancy debates By: enarchay (05/11/2007 - 05:37)
- Re: inerrancy debates By: shiert (05/11/2007 - 15:56)
- Re: inerrancy debates By: enarchay (06/11/2007 - 07:43)
- Re: inerrancy debates By: Jacob (08/11/2007 - 17:48)
- Re: inerrancy debates By: enarchay (06/11/2007 - 07:43)
- Re: inerrancy debates By: shiert (05/11/2007 - 15:56)

Contradictions in the Gospels: Problems or Opportunities?
Day One: A Sir Toby's Creation Myth
A Generous Orthdoxy - Brian McLaren
The Lost World of Genesis One - John H. Walton