I feel we can safely accept
I feel we can safely accept
by jazzact13 - 22/06/2007 - 13:41
I feel we can safely accept the mission and purpose of Jesus and Paul without having to accept their 1st century worldview or the worldview of later Christians that developed the creeds and much of our theological history.
II Peter 1
16 We did not follow cleverly invented stories when we told you about the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we were eyewitnesses of his majesty. 17 For he received honor and glory from God the Father when the voice came to him from the Majestic Glory, saying, "This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased." 18 We ourselves heard this voice that came from heaven when we were with him on the sacred mountain.
God as Hypothesis? By: Jacob (67 replies) 23 May, 2007 - 15:02
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: heffe (10/07/2007 - 09:00)
- THE NEED FOR DEFENDING THE FAITH By: jazzact13 (22/06/2007 - 13:52)
- Re: THE NEED FOR DEFENDING THE FAITH By: mentalrover (29/06/2007 - 13:13)
- Re: THE NEED FOR DEFENDING THE FAITH By: paulhartigan (23/06/2007 - 10:51)
- Re: THE NEED FOR DEFENDING THE FAITH By: jazzact13 (02/07/2007 - 20:02)
- Re: THE NEED FOR DEFENDING THE FAITH By: mentalrover (03/07/2007 - 09:57)
- Re: THE NEED FOR DEFENDING THE FAITH By: peter wilkinson (23/06/2007 - 12:37)
- NT Wright on the resurrection By: paulhartigan (26/06/2007 - 01:51)
- Re: NT Wright on the resurrection By: TomH (09/07/2007 - 22:56)
- Evidence By: paulhartigan (10/07/2007 - 03:56)
- Re: Evidence By: TomH (10/07/2007 - 05:31)
- Evidence By: paulhartigan (10/07/2007 - 03:56)
- Re: NT Wright on the resurrection By: jazzact13 (02/07/2007 - 20:15)
- Re: NT Wright on the resurrection By: paulhartigan (03/07/2007 - 03:37)
- Re: NT Wright on the resurrection By: danutz (28/06/2007 - 15:17)
- Re: NT Wright on the resurrection By: total_loser (01/07/2007 - 17:16)
- Hypotheses about the resurrection By: paulhartigan (01/07/2007 - 21:30)
- Re: Hypotheses about the resurrection By: peter wilkinson (02/07/2007 - 14:08)
- Historical evidence for the resurrection By: paulhartigan (03/07/2007 - 01:51)
- Re: Historical evidence for the resurrection By: total_loser (03/07/2007 - 17:09)
- Re: Historical evidence for the resurrection By: paulhartigan (03/07/2007 - 21:26)
- Re: Historical evidence for the resurrection By: total_loser (03/07/2007 - 17:09)
- Historical evidence for the resurrection By: paulhartigan (03/07/2007 - 01:51)
- Re: Hypotheses about the resurrection By: peter wilkinson (02/07/2007 - 14:08)
- Hypotheses about the resurrection By: paulhartigan (01/07/2007 - 21:30)
- Re: NT Wright on the resurrection By: total_loser (01/07/2007 - 17:16)
- Re: NT Wright on the resurrection By: TomH (09/07/2007 - 22:56)
- Hmmm... interesting.. VERY interesting By: paulhartigan (24/06/2007 - 11:33)
- RE: Can a Scientist Believe in the Resurrection (Wright) By: total_loser (25/06/2007 - 01:34)
- NT Wright on the resurrection By: paulhartigan (26/06/2007 - 01:51)
- Re: THE NEED FOR DEFENDING THE FAITH By: jazzact13 (02/07/2007 - 20:02)
- Worrying away at the bone By: paulhartigan (13/06/2007 - 10:53)
- Re: Worrying away at the bone By: Jacob (13/06/2007 - 14:35)
- Re: Worrying away at the bone By: peter wilkinson (14/06/2007 - 11:40)
- Re: Worrying away at the bone By: paulhartigan (14/06/2007 - 03:01)
- Re: Worrying away at the bone By: Jacob (14/06/2007 - 15:23)
- Jesus changes lives is an empirical fact ? By: paulhartigan (14/06/2007 - 21:13)
- Re: Jesus changes lives is an empirical fact ? By: Jacob (14/06/2007 - 22:26)
- Jesus changes lives is an empirical fact ? By: paulhartigan (14/06/2007 - 21:13)
- Re: Worrying away at the bone By: Jacob (14/06/2007 - 15:23)
- Re: Worrying away at the bone By: Daniel D. Farmer (13/06/2007 - 15:25)
- Re: Worrying away at the bone By: Jacob (13/06/2007 - 16:08)
- Re: Worrying away at the bone By: Jacob (13/06/2007 - 14:35)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: total_loser (11/06/2007 - 23:02)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: peter wilkinson (12/06/2007 - 00:17)
- Resurrection and new creation By: Andrew (12/06/2007 - 11:46)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: Jacob (12/06/2007 - 05:40)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: peter wilkinson (12/06/2007 - 07:09)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: Jacob (12/06/2007 - 15:24)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: peter wilkinson (12/06/2007 - 16:11)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: Jacob (12/06/2007 - 16:53)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: peter wilkinson (12/06/2007 - 18:15)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: Jacob (12/06/2007 - 19:04)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: Daniel D. Farmer (12/06/2007 - 19:50)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: Jacob (12/06/2007 - 21:11)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: Daniel D. Farmer (12/06/2007 - 19:50)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: Jacob (12/06/2007 - 19:04)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: peter wilkinson (12/06/2007 - 18:15)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: Jacob (12/06/2007 - 16:53)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: peter wilkinson (12/06/2007 - 16:11)
- Resurrection as metaphor By: paulhartigan (12/06/2007 - 08:47)
- Re: Resurrection as metaphor By: peter wilkinson (12/06/2007 - 11:32)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: Jacob (12/06/2007 - 15:24)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: peter wilkinson (12/06/2007 - 07:09)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: peter wilkinson (12/06/2007 - 00:17)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: ninjaaron (08/06/2007 - 12:47)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: jazzact13 (08/06/2007 - 22:01)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: peter wilkinson (08/06/2007 - 10:20)
- More on God as Hypothesis By: paulhartigan (09/06/2007 - 03:34)
- Re: More on God as Hypothesis By: Jacob (09/06/2007 - 18:05)
- Re: More on God as Hypothesis By: peter wilkinson (09/06/2007 - 14:36)
- Belief, superstition and gullibility By: paulhartigan (10/06/2007 - 13:44)
- Re: Belief, superstition and gullibility By: peter wilkinson (10/06/2007 - 23:28)
- My view of faith By: paulhartigan (12/06/2007 - 00:35)
- Re: Belief, superstition and gullibility By: Jacob (11/06/2007 - 00:10)
- Re: Belief, superstition and gullibility By: peter wilkinson (10/06/2007 - 23:28)
- Belief, superstition and gullibility By: paulhartigan (10/06/2007 - 13:44)
- More on God as Hypothesis By: paulhartigan (09/06/2007 - 03:34)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: jazzact13 (07/06/2007 - 21:44)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: danutz (13/06/2007 - 18:54)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: jazzact13 (15/06/2007 - 13:51)
- jazzact13,
Are you then By: danutz (15/06/2007 - 20:48)
- I feel we can safely accept By: jazzact13 (22/06/2007 - 13:41)
- I’m just curious how far By: jazzact13 (16/06/2007 - 17:36)
- the roots of fundamentalism in Chicago... By: danutz (16/06/2007 - 22:23)
- jazzact13,
Are you then By: danutz (15/06/2007 - 20:48)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: jazzact13 (15/06/2007 - 13:51)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: danutz (13/06/2007 - 18:54)
- God not a hypothesis but.... By: paulhartigan (07/06/2007 - 01:26)
- Re: God not a hypothesis but.... By: peter wilkinson (07/06/2007 - 15:03)
- Re: God not a hypothesis but.... By: paulhartigan (08/06/2007 - 01:21)
- Re: God not a hypothesis but.... By: Jacob (07/06/2007 - 20:27)
- Re: God not a hypothesis but.... By: peter wilkinson (07/06/2007 - 15:03)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: Andrew (06/06/2007 - 09:34)

Contradictions in the Gospels: Problems or Opportunities?
Day One: A Sir Toby's Creation Myth
A Generous Orthdoxy - Brian McLaren
The Lost World of Genesis One - John H. Walton