Re: God as Hypothesis?
Re: God as Hypothesis?
This is an interesting point, and I've often thought similar things myself. Josh McDowell style apologetics don't really turn me on either. However, they have resulted in a changed life for some people, and one can't say that their experience of the power of God has been disingenuous simply because they faith had a start in empirical inquiry. God created the natural word, and he created the human mind, and there is nothing "un-spiritual" about investigating our reality through rational means.
I can understand it not being something everyone would want to study deeply. It suppose it's much like mathematics, for many people math is difficult and something they want as little to do with as possible, while for others mathematics is a joy that opens before them like a horizon.
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: heffe (10/07/2007 - 09:00)
- THE NEED FOR DEFENDING THE FAITH By: jazzact13 (22/06/2007 - 13:52)
- Re: THE NEED FOR DEFENDING THE FAITH By: mentalrover (29/06/2007 - 13:13)
- Re: THE NEED FOR DEFENDING THE FAITH By: paulhartigan (23/06/2007 - 10:51)
- Re: THE NEED FOR DEFENDING THE FAITH By: jazzact13 (02/07/2007 - 20:02)
- Re: THE NEED FOR DEFENDING THE FAITH By: mentalrover (03/07/2007 - 09:57)
- Re: THE NEED FOR DEFENDING THE FAITH By: peter wilkinson (23/06/2007 - 12:37)
- NT Wright on the resurrection By: paulhartigan (26/06/2007 - 01:51)
- Re: NT Wright on the resurrection By: TomH (09/07/2007 - 22:56)
- Evidence By: paulhartigan (10/07/2007 - 03:56)
- Re: Evidence By: TomH (10/07/2007 - 05:31)
- Evidence By: paulhartigan (10/07/2007 - 03:56)
- Re: NT Wright on the resurrection By: jazzact13 (02/07/2007 - 20:15)
- Re: NT Wright on the resurrection By: paulhartigan (03/07/2007 - 03:37)
- Re: NT Wright on the resurrection By: danutz (28/06/2007 - 15:17)
- Re: NT Wright on the resurrection By: total_loser (01/07/2007 - 17:16)
- Hypotheses about the resurrection By: paulhartigan (01/07/2007 - 21:30)
- Re: Hypotheses about the resurrection By: peter wilkinson (02/07/2007 - 14:08)
- Historical evidence for the resurrection By: paulhartigan (03/07/2007 - 01:51)
- Re: Historical evidence for the resurrection By: total_loser (03/07/2007 - 17:09)
- Re: Historical evidence for the resurrection By: paulhartigan (03/07/2007 - 21:26)
- Re: Historical evidence for the resurrection By: total_loser (03/07/2007 - 17:09)
- Historical evidence for the resurrection By: paulhartigan (03/07/2007 - 01:51)
- Re: Hypotheses about the resurrection By: peter wilkinson (02/07/2007 - 14:08)
- Hypotheses about the resurrection By: paulhartigan (01/07/2007 - 21:30)
- Re: NT Wright on the resurrection By: total_loser (01/07/2007 - 17:16)
- Re: NT Wright on the resurrection By: TomH (09/07/2007 - 22:56)
- Hmmm... interesting.. VERY interesting By: paulhartigan (24/06/2007 - 11:33)
- RE: Can a Scientist Believe in the Resurrection (Wright) By: total_loser (25/06/2007 - 01:34)
- NT Wright on the resurrection By: paulhartigan (26/06/2007 - 01:51)
- Re: THE NEED FOR DEFENDING THE FAITH By: jazzact13 (02/07/2007 - 20:02)
- Worrying away at the bone By: paulhartigan (13/06/2007 - 10:53)
- Re: Worrying away at the bone By: Jacob (13/06/2007 - 14:35)
- Re: Worrying away at the bone By: peter wilkinson (14/06/2007 - 11:40)
- Re: Worrying away at the bone By: paulhartigan (14/06/2007 - 03:01)
- Re: Worrying away at the bone By: Jacob (14/06/2007 - 15:23)
- Jesus changes lives is an empirical fact ? By: paulhartigan (14/06/2007 - 21:13)
- Re: Jesus changes lives is an empirical fact ? By: Jacob (14/06/2007 - 22:26)
- Jesus changes lives is an empirical fact ? By: paulhartigan (14/06/2007 - 21:13)
- Re: Worrying away at the bone By: Jacob (14/06/2007 - 15:23)
- Re: Worrying away at the bone By: Daniel D. Farmer (13/06/2007 - 15:25)
- Re: Worrying away at the bone By: Jacob (13/06/2007 - 16:08)
- Re: Worrying away at the bone By: Jacob (13/06/2007 - 14:35)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: total_loser (11/06/2007 - 23:02)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: peter wilkinson (12/06/2007 - 00:17)
- Resurrection and new creation By: Andrew (12/06/2007 - 11:46)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: Jacob (12/06/2007 - 05:40)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: peter wilkinson (12/06/2007 - 07:09)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: Jacob (12/06/2007 - 15:24)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: peter wilkinson (12/06/2007 - 16:11)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: Jacob (12/06/2007 - 16:53)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: peter wilkinson (12/06/2007 - 18:15)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: Jacob (12/06/2007 - 19:04)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: Daniel D. Farmer (12/06/2007 - 19:50)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: Jacob (12/06/2007 - 21:11)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: Daniel D. Farmer (12/06/2007 - 19:50)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: Jacob (12/06/2007 - 19:04)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: peter wilkinson (12/06/2007 - 18:15)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: Jacob (12/06/2007 - 16:53)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: peter wilkinson (12/06/2007 - 16:11)
- Resurrection as metaphor By: paulhartigan (12/06/2007 - 08:47)
- Re: Resurrection as metaphor By: peter wilkinson (12/06/2007 - 11:32)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: Jacob (12/06/2007 - 15:24)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: peter wilkinson (12/06/2007 - 07:09)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: peter wilkinson (12/06/2007 - 00:17)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: ninjaaron (08/06/2007 - 12:47)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: jazzact13 (08/06/2007 - 22:01)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: peter wilkinson (08/06/2007 - 10:20)
- More on God as Hypothesis By: paulhartigan (09/06/2007 - 03:34)
- Re: More on God as Hypothesis By: Jacob (09/06/2007 - 18:05)
- Re: More on God as Hypothesis By: peter wilkinson (09/06/2007 - 14:36)
- Belief, superstition and gullibility By: paulhartigan (10/06/2007 - 13:44)
- Re: Belief, superstition and gullibility By: peter wilkinson (10/06/2007 - 23:28)
- My view of faith By: paulhartigan (12/06/2007 - 00:35)
- Re: Belief, superstition and gullibility By: Jacob (11/06/2007 - 00:10)
- Re: Belief, superstition and gullibility By: peter wilkinson (10/06/2007 - 23:28)
- Belief, superstition and gullibility By: paulhartigan (10/06/2007 - 13:44)
- More on God as Hypothesis By: paulhartigan (09/06/2007 - 03:34)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: jazzact13 (07/06/2007 - 21:44)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: danutz (13/06/2007 - 18:54)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: jazzact13 (15/06/2007 - 13:51)
- jazzact13,
Are you then By: danutz (15/06/2007 - 20:48)
- I feel we can safely accept By: jazzact13 (22/06/2007 - 13:41)
- I’m just curious how far By: jazzact13 (16/06/2007 - 17:36)
- the roots of fundamentalism in Chicago... By: danutz (16/06/2007 - 22:23)
- jazzact13,
Are you then By: danutz (15/06/2007 - 20:48)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: jazzact13 (15/06/2007 - 13:51)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: danutz (13/06/2007 - 18:54)
- God not a hypothesis but.... By: paulhartigan (07/06/2007 - 01:26)
- Re: God not a hypothesis but.... By: peter wilkinson (07/06/2007 - 15:03)
- Re: God not a hypothesis but.... By: paulhartigan (08/06/2007 - 01:21)
- Re: God not a hypothesis but.... By: Jacob (07/06/2007 - 20:27)
- Re: God not a hypothesis but.... By: peter wilkinson (07/06/2007 - 15:03)
- Re: God as Hypothesis? By: Andrew (06/06/2007 - 09:34)

Contradictions in the Gospels: Problems or Opportunities?
Day One: A Sir Toby's Creation Myth
A Generous Orthdoxy - Brian McLaren
The Lost World of Genesis One - John H. Walton