John doyle,

that’s a very interesting reading both from the perspective of potentialities becoming and from the aspect of active dialogue within the text. It does indeed add a different dimension when viewed as a conversation about revelation in action!

As dissident asks, one of the very acute questions is authorial intent, and I guess as we go into the text, we will have to come to some conclusions. However, one primary matter is the question of who God is. Is our text unequivocally monotheistic or could there be some other explanation for the plural form of elohim ?

Live to serve : Serve to live