Re: not an either or
God v Science debate between Richard Dawkins and Francis Collins By: paulhartigan (45 replies) 11 November, 2006 - 01:00
- WHAT WOULD GOD HAVE TO DO TO PROVE HIS EXISTENCE? By: wb4qiz (26/10/2009 - 09:55)
- Re: God v Science debate between Richard Dawkins and Francis Col By: R.C. (16/12/2007 - 05:09)
- whence altruism? By: john doyle (28/11/2006 - 06:27)
- genetic altruism By: john doyle (27/11/2006 - 21:14)
- The way of the cross By: samlcarr (28/11/2006 - 01:38)
- Re: God v Science debate between Richard Dawkins and Francis Col By: peter wilkinson (27/11/2006 - 11:52)
- Altruism and the selfish gene By: paulhartigan (28/11/2006 - 07:00)
- unsuccessful synthesis By: samlcarr (27/11/2006 - 16:01)
- Re: Science + Faith Blog By: driz (27/11/2006 - 05:06)
- Re: God v Science debate between Richard Dawkins and Francis Col By: kingjames1 (24/11/2006 - 04:58)
- Re: God v Science debate between Richard Dawkins and Francis Col By: cougar390gt (22/11/2006 - 06:25)
- Re: God v Science debate between Richard Dawkins and Francis Col By: Melody (17/11/2006 - 21:28)
- not an either or By: stacy (17/11/2006 - 23:09)
- Re: not an either or By: Melody (22/11/2006 - 02:40)
- on God-memes By: john doyle (20/11/2006 - 11:49)
- Re: on God-memes By: peter wilkinson (20/11/2006 - 12:18)
- Re: on God-memes By: samlcarr (20/11/2006 - 12:29)
- Re: on God-memes By: peter wilkinson (20/11/2006 - 12:18)
- not an either or By: stacy (17/11/2006 - 23:09)
- Re: God does not disappoint By: Melody (17/11/2006 - 08:07)
- Re: God does not disappoint By: stacy (17/11/2006 - 16:11)
- Re: Parenting and free will By: Melody (17/11/2006 - 00:44)
- faith By: stacy (17/11/2006 - 02:41)
- Re: God v Science debate between Richard Dawkins and Francis Col By: Melody (14/11/2006 - 22:25)
- Re: God v Science debate between Richard Dawkins and Francis Col By: stacy (16/11/2006 - 15:44)
- a weaker belief in science? By: samlcarr (14/11/2006 - 21:34)
- sending a strong delusion... By: liquidlight (14/11/2006 - 05:18)
- cultural selection of belief? By: john doyle (14/11/2006 - 09:39)
- Cultural selection of belief and a surprise visit of Dawkins By: peter wilkinson (14/11/2006 - 12:38)
- never thought of it that way By: stacy (14/11/2006 - 16:10)
- Cultural selection of belief and a surprise visit of Dawkins By: peter wilkinson (14/11/2006 - 12:38)
- cultural selection of belief? By: john doyle (14/11/2006 - 09:39)
- Re: God v Science debate between Richard Dawkins and Francis Col By: Sun Warrior (13/11/2006 - 18:21)
- Games, narratives and worldviews By: peter wilkinson (13/11/2006 - 16:32)
- apologia By: samlcarr (13/11/2006 - 22:15)
- Clarifications etc By: paulhartigan (13/11/2006 - 11:13)
- on rugby and koalas By: john doyle (13/11/2006 - 12:53)
- where's the fire? By: samlcarr (12/11/2006 - 20:41)
- Science & Religion By: driz (12/11/2006 - 18:50)
- Yes, but religion is not privileged either By: paulhartigan (12/11/2006 - 02:39)
- Science, faith and privilege By: peter wilkinson (12/11/2006 - 10:29)
- some clarifications of the scientific stance By: john doyle (12/11/2006 - 16:20)
- religion is establishment superstition By: samlcarr (12/11/2006 - 06:37)
- Science, faith and privilege By: peter wilkinson (12/11/2006 - 10:29)
- ship of fools? By: Melody (11/11/2006 - 22:49)
- Re: ship of fools? By: wb4qiz (26/10/2009 - 09:32)
- Re: ship of fools? By: john doyle (27/10/2009 - 14:02)
- Re: ship of fools? By: john doyle (01/11/2009 - 19:01)
- Re: ship of fools? By: john doyle (27/10/2009 - 14:02)
- Re: ship of fools? By: wb4qiz (26/10/2009 - 09:32)
- facinating read By: stacy (11/11/2006 - 20:46)
- The Dawkins Delusion? By: peter wilkinson (11/11/2006 - 23:34)
Re: not an either or
Stacy, I’m not angry, just confused. I’m baffled where any hint of anger could be construed in what I wrote. I believe I misunderstood where you were coming from initially. I thought you were searching for some answers and some Biblical encouragement. Apparently I was wrong. It seems you are content with searching and I wish you all the best.
Happy Thanksgiving.