apologia
God v Science debate between Richard Dawkins and Francis Collins By: paulhartigan (45 replies) 11 November, 2006 - 01:00
- WHAT WOULD GOD HAVE TO DO TO PROVE HIS EXISTENCE? By: wb4qiz (26/10/2009 - 09:55)
- Re: God v Science debate between Richard Dawkins and Francis Col By: R.C. (16/12/2007 - 05:09)
- whence altruism? By: john doyle (28/11/2006 - 06:27)
- genetic altruism By: john doyle (27/11/2006 - 21:14)
- The way of the cross By: samlcarr (28/11/2006 - 01:38)
- Re: God v Science debate between Richard Dawkins and Francis Col By: peter wilkinson (27/11/2006 - 11:52)
- Altruism and the selfish gene By: paulhartigan (28/11/2006 - 07:00)
- unsuccessful synthesis By: samlcarr (27/11/2006 - 16:01)
- Re: Science + Faith Blog By: driz (27/11/2006 - 05:06)
- Re: God v Science debate between Richard Dawkins and Francis Col By: kingjames1 (24/11/2006 - 04:58)
- Re: God v Science debate between Richard Dawkins and Francis Col By: cougar390gt (22/11/2006 - 06:25)
- Re: God v Science debate between Richard Dawkins and Francis Col By: Melody (17/11/2006 - 21:28)
- not an either or By: stacy (17/11/2006 - 23:09)
- Re: not an either or By: Melody (22/11/2006 - 02:40)
- on God-memes By: john doyle (20/11/2006 - 11:49)
- Re: on God-memes By: peter wilkinson (20/11/2006 - 12:18)
- Re: on God-memes By: samlcarr (20/11/2006 - 12:29)
- Re: on God-memes By: peter wilkinson (20/11/2006 - 12:18)
- not an either or By: stacy (17/11/2006 - 23:09)
- Re: God does not disappoint By: Melody (17/11/2006 - 08:07)
- Re: God does not disappoint By: stacy (17/11/2006 - 16:11)
- Re: Parenting and free will By: Melody (17/11/2006 - 00:44)
- faith By: stacy (17/11/2006 - 02:41)
- Re: God v Science debate between Richard Dawkins and Francis Col By: Melody (14/11/2006 - 22:25)
- Re: God v Science debate between Richard Dawkins and Francis Col By: stacy (16/11/2006 - 15:44)
- a weaker belief in science? By: samlcarr (14/11/2006 - 21:34)
- sending a strong delusion... By: liquidlight (14/11/2006 - 05:18)
- cultural selection of belief? By: john doyle (14/11/2006 - 09:39)
- Cultural selection of belief and a surprise visit of Dawkins By: peter wilkinson (14/11/2006 - 12:38)
- never thought of it that way By: stacy (14/11/2006 - 16:10)
- Cultural selection of belief and a surprise visit of Dawkins By: peter wilkinson (14/11/2006 - 12:38)
- cultural selection of belief? By: john doyle (14/11/2006 - 09:39)
- Re: God v Science debate between Richard Dawkins and Francis Col By: Sun Warrior (13/11/2006 - 18:21)
- Games, narratives and worldviews By: peter wilkinson (13/11/2006 - 16:32)
- apologia By: samlcarr (13/11/2006 - 22:15)
- Clarifications etc By: paulhartigan (13/11/2006 - 11:13)
- on rugby and koalas By: john doyle (13/11/2006 - 12:53)
- where's the fire? By: samlcarr (12/11/2006 - 20:41)
- Science & Religion By: driz (12/11/2006 - 18:50)
- Yes, but religion is not privileged either By: paulhartigan (12/11/2006 - 02:39)
- Science, faith and privilege By: peter wilkinson (12/11/2006 - 10:29)
- some clarifications of the scientific stance By: john doyle (12/11/2006 - 16:20)
- religion is establishment superstition By: samlcarr (12/11/2006 - 06:37)
- Science, faith and privilege By: peter wilkinson (12/11/2006 - 10:29)
- ship of fools? By: Melody (11/11/2006 - 22:49)
- Re: ship of fools? By: wb4qiz (26/10/2009 - 09:32)
- Re: ship of fools? By: john doyle (27/10/2009 - 14:02)
- Re: ship of fools? By: john doyle (01/11/2009 - 19:01)
- Re: ship of fools? By: john doyle (27/10/2009 - 14:02)
- Re: ship of fools? By: wb4qiz (26/10/2009 - 09:32)
- facinating read By: stacy (11/11/2006 - 20:46)
- The Dawkins Delusion? By: peter wilkinson (11/11/2006 - 23:34)
apologia
I entirely agree. A robust belief in God and the bible will produce a startlingly different worldview in a living community of followers who shine with the light of Jesus and His truth.
The sad fact is that the church has proved to be a hollow shell and that is what gives its critics, scientist or atheist, the gall to criticise. It is also the reason why we lose debates. We do not seem to know the ground that we stand on and every time we take our eyes off it, the ground disappears. Pity the predator that has to hunt under these conditions!
Yet, the foolishness of the cross is the answer and an answer that no number Dawkinses will be able to deal with. It’s easy to miss the flea when you’re out with an elephant gun, and that is Dawkins frustration.
Despite all that, the apostle Peter urges us to give a reasonable answer to all who would question us and it is precisely this, an effective PoMo apologetic, that we now seem to have lost sight of. Not that I was greatly impressed with any of the apologetics produced for the modern world -except for the delightfully oblique efforts of C.S. Lewis.
Live to serve : Serve to live