inflexible metaphors?
Ramification By: samlcarr (26 replies) 30 September, 2006 - 10:24
- Re: Ramification By: greenmonkey (13/11/2006 - 20:44)
- Re: Ramification By: AG (05/12/2006 - 05:25)
- Love one another as I have loved you By: samlcarr (05/12/2006 - 08:03)
- Re: Ramification By: AG (05/12/2006 - 05:25)
- shocking but true (double entry - sorry all) By: samlcarr (29/10/2006 - 11:00)
- shocking but true By: samlcarr (29/10/2006 - 10:01)
- God's qualities in all things By: Virgil (29/10/2006 - 15:51)
- Spiritual Confusion By: AG (27/10/2006 - 06:08)
- no confusion here By: stacy (27/10/2006 - 13:09)
- Plenty of Confusion There By: AG (28/10/2006 - 04:06)
- God as object By: samlcarr (28/10/2006 - 08:21)
- samlcarr, I am shocked By: AG (29/10/2006 - 02:59)
- too many assumptions By: Virgil (29/10/2006 - 04:03)
- samlcarr, I am shocked By: AG (29/10/2006 - 02:59)
- too bad By: stacy (28/10/2006 - 04:33)
- God as object By: samlcarr (28/10/2006 - 08:21)
- Plenty of Confusion There By: AG (28/10/2006 - 04:06)
- no confusion here By: stacy (27/10/2006 - 13:09)
- Emerg/ent/ing anthropology and etymology By: bobcmu76 (04/10/2006 - 05:22)
- inflexible metaphors? By: samlcarr (04/10/2006 - 12:12)
- Faith to let die. By: bobcmu76 (04/10/2006 - 16:17)
- the stench of fear and the aroma of love By: samlcarr (09/10/2006 - 05:46)
- high anxiety By: bobcmu76 (09/10/2006 - 07:34)
- the stench of fear and the aroma of love By: samlcarr (09/10/2006 - 05:46)
- Faith to let die. By: bobcmu76 (04/10/2006 - 16:17)
- inflexible metaphors? By: samlcarr (04/10/2006 - 12:12)
- dreams By: janamills (01/10/2006 - 00:18)
- what's in a name? By: samlcarr (01/10/2006 - 16:11)
- practical? perhaps a start By: stacy (01/10/2006 - 16:39)
- a start By: janamills (05/10/2006 - 20:55)
- free to be By: samlcarr (05/10/2006 - 21:58)
- yes! By: stacy (05/10/2006 - 22:23)
- common mission By: janamills (08/10/2006 - 23:06)
- yes! By: stacy (05/10/2006 - 22:23)
- free to be By: samlcarr (05/10/2006 - 21:58)
- a start By: janamills (05/10/2006 - 20:55)
- practical? perhaps a start By: stacy (01/10/2006 - 16:39)
- what's in a name? By: samlcarr (01/10/2006 - 16:11)
- the analogy of a tree By: stacy (30/09/2006 - 15:49)
inflexible metaphors?
Trees are not as biblical as vines and indeed the tree is far too independent a creature to really express the body of Christ. Vines require a supportive framework so the more we lean on God the better our vine will be. Lay a vine on its own on the ground and it will soon rot away.
The problem of course is that whatever else is taught about the body is subsumed under the dominant fact that there is only one vine. One is either a part of it or not. Herein lies the schismatic’s problem for one cannot declare oneself cut off, instead one has to argue that all others are just ‘vinelike growths’ and are not branches of the one vine.
With us “emergers” we do have an in-built diversity that should help to protect us from infighting. But, I see the bigger problem as being that while we may be emerging theologically, from whatever our roots were (to spoil the metaphor), we still have to figure how we are still connected in real ways to the parent body. Thinking that we are out to plant our own private vineyard(s) will mean a complete break from the bible and from the God-declared one vine.
Live to serve : Serve to live