All comments

Contradictions in the Gospels: Problems or Opportunities?

Jacob: Re: Contradictions in the... (1 day ago)
Jacob: Re: Contradictions in the... (2 days ago)
peter wilkinson: Re: Contradictions in the... (2 days ago)

Day One: A Sir Toby's Creation Myth

john doyle: Re: Day One: A Sir Toby's... (2 days ago)

A Generous Orthdoxy - Brian McLaren

john doyle: Re: A Generous Orthdoxy - Brian... (2 days ago)

The Lost World of Genesis One - John H. Walton

john doyle: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (2 days ago)
peter wilkinson: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (2 days ago)
john doyle: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (3 days ago)
peter wilkinson: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (3 days ago)
john doyle: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (3 days ago)
Syndicate content

sucking the beautiful and meaningful

sucking the beautiful and meaningful

Theology can make it dry and manageable and boring. What I think Emerging Theology must do, however, beyond the specific topics is approach it in the way that describes the beautiful and meaningful. What is beautiful and meaningful about our faith? Why do we dance and delight and celebrate? Who is this God who is above all things yet has entered into our world to create and participate?

The problem with much theology is that it has the character of dry, remote philosophy. An Emerging theology, however, should have an aesthetic. It should be a poetry of itself, an elegant description of an elegant, sublime reality.

The earliest theologies had this character, it was descriptive and worship all thrown together, the discussion about God never separated from the devotion to God.

I think the Emerging Theology will have more of the character of the Eastern Church rather than the Western Church. I like how Lossky characterizes this:

The eastern tradition has never made a sharp distinction between mysticism and theology; between personal experience of the divine mysetries and the dogma affirmed by the Church… We must live the dogma expressing a revealed truth, which appears to us as an unfathomable mystery, in such a fashion that instead of assimilating the mystery to our mode of understanding, we should , on the contrary, look for profound change, an inner transformation of spirit, enabling us to experience it mystically. Far from being mutually opposed, theology and mysticism support and complete each other. One is impossible without the other. If the mystical experience is a personal working out of the content of the common faith, theology is an expression, for the profit of all, of that which can be experienced by everyone… There is, therefore, no Christian mysticism without theology; but, above all, there is no theology without mysticism. (Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church, 8)

The problem with much theology as presently presented is that not only has it not supported mysticism it has intentionally tried to distance itself from mysticism.

Rather than a list of rules, standards, positions and traits an Emerging Theology can and should describe the divine and the divine experience as a poem, as a dance, as a beautiful recitation of our mystical interaction, letting our minds and our souls and the Spirit mingle together in beautiful carefully constructed praise of the God who is and who we have learned him to be.

What (again) is an emerging theology? By: Andrew (28 replies) 5 July, 2006 - 10:32