Sorry for the “anonymous” thing.

Anyways, you say:
“What interests me about critical-realism is not that it provides us with better grounds for believing that God raised Jesus from the dead but that it gives us a better – and in some sense, therefore, a ‘truer’ – methodology for understanding what it means to say that God raised Jesus from the dead.”

I would say that it’s not the critical-realist methodology that provides a better meaning of “god raised Jesus from the dead.” It’s the particular historical story that Wright tells us, which is really, really good, despite his “critical-realist methodology.”