Decoding
Jesus Creed discussion By: Andrew (17 replies) 18 May, 2006 - 14:03
- Jesus Creed response By: Greg Mc (23/05/2006 - 19:36)
- Is difficult really so bad? By: andrew (24/05/2006 - 00:15)
- >>On what grounds do you By: Joel Richardson (21/05/2006 - 06:21)
- Jesus Creed By: Joel Richardson (18/05/2006 - 22:01)
- AD 70 and beyond By: andrew (21/05/2006 - 12:10)
- Andrew, By: Joel Richardson (21/05/2006 - 22:00)
- Prophecy and history By: andrew (22/05/2006 - 12:07)
- Thanks Andrew,
Doesn't ruin By: Joel Richardson (22/05/2006 - 13:52)
- Coming on the clouds of heaven By: andrew (22/05/2006 - 14:49)
- Andrew, Thanks again. This By: Joel Richardson (23/05/2006 - 01:38)
- Answers to questions By: andrew (23/05/2006 - 23:10)
- Andrew, By: Joel Richardson (24/05/2006 - 02:02)
- Decoding By: andrew (24/05/2006 - 11:05)
- Never judge a book by its By: Joel Richardson (24/05/2006 - 13:42)
- . . . cover By: peter wilkinson (24/05/2006 - 16:47)
- Peter, Hopefully not By: Joel Richardson (24/05/2006 - 23:50)
- . . . cover By: peter wilkinson (24/05/2006 - 16:47)
- Never judge a book by its By: Joel Richardson (24/05/2006 - 13:42)
- Decoding By: andrew (24/05/2006 - 11:05)
- Andrew, By: Joel Richardson (24/05/2006 - 02:02)
- Answers to questions By: andrew (23/05/2006 - 23:10)
- Andrew, Thanks again. This By: Joel Richardson (23/05/2006 - 01:38)
- Coming on the clouds of heaven By: andrew (22/05/2006 - 14:49)
- Thanks Andrew,
Doesn't ruin By: Joel Richardson (22/05/2006 - 13:52)
- Prophecy and history By: andrew (22/05/2006 - 12:07)
- Andrew, By: Joel Richardson (21/05/2006 - 22:00)
- Video Projection and Labor Pains By: pastorerik (18/05/2006 - 22:24)
- AD 70 and beyond By: andrew (21/05/2006 - 12:10)
Decoding
Joel, having seen the title of your book I am surprised we managed to keep the conversation going this long! Let’s take that as a very positive thing.
What you characterize as allegorical decoding, I regard as uncovering the realistic prophetic narrative out of which the NT has constructed its view of the future. To my mind these are two very different things. I agree with N.T. Wright that ‘understanding how stories worked in the ancient world, and how a small allusion could and did summon up an entire implicit narrative, including narratives within which speaker and hearer believed themselves to be living’ is vital for NT interpretation (Paul: Fresh Perspectives, 8).
It is the need to bring this allusiveness to the surface that creates the impression of decoding. But where we really differ is over the nature of controlling narrative, which is a much broader hermeneutical question than can be properly addressed in a piecemeal exegetical approach.