Re: very apocryphal references
Revelation 12 | Marian Significance By: Ivan Latham (68 replies) 22 January, 2005 - 08:18
- Scriptural Censorship By: Ivan Latham (11/02/2005 - 05:25)
- canon fodder By: deacon (11/02/2005 - 21:00)
- very apocryphal references By: deacon (17/02/2005 - 19:06)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: Lloyd Dale (22/02/2006 - 08:24)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: deacon (23/02/2006 - 16:37)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: Lloyd Dale (23/02/2006 - 18:40)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: deacon (23/02/2006 - 20:44)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: Lloyd Dale (24/02/2006 - 06:45)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: deacon (24/02/2006 - 12:41)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: Lloyd Dale (27/02/2006 - 00:09)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: Lloyd Dale (24/02/2006 - 18:45)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: peter wilkinson (24/02/2006 - 19:51)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: Lloyd Dale (27/02/2006 - 00:53)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: peter wilkinson (27/02/2006 - 10:49)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: Lloyd Dale (28/02/2006 - 23:01)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: peter wilkinson (27/02/2006 - 10:49)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: Lloyd Dale (27/02/2006 - 00:53)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: peter wilkinson (24/02/2006 - 19:51)
- Re: the question of Mary By: Albannach (24/02/2006 - 15:21)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: deacon (24/02/2006 - 12:41)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: Lloyd Dale (24/02/2006 - 06:45)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: deacon (23/02/2006 - 20:44)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: Lloyd Dale (23/02/2006 - 18:40)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: deacon (23/02/2006 - 16:37)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: Lloyd Dale (22/02/2006 - 08:24)
- NT 'Apocryphal' References By: Ivan Latham (16/02/2005 - 05:08)
- very apocryphal references By: deacon (17/02/2005 - 19:06)
- Hebrew Bible By: lindellk (11/02/2005 - 21:00)
- canon fodder By: deacon (11/02/2005 - 21:00)
- The traditions of men By: deacon (11/02/2005 - 02:25)
- Sacrificial Mediation By: Ivan Latham (10/02/2005 - 13:14)
- Intercessory prayer By: erlenmeyer71 (10/02/2005 - 17:14)
- Testimony of Tradition By: Ivan Latham (10/02/2005 - 05:58)
- Tradition By: erlenmeyer71 (10/02/2005 - 07:18)
- NT Basis for Marian Intercession By: Ivan Latham (05/02/2005 - 10:41)
- whatever By: deacon (05/02/2005 - 12:28)
- Rev 12 and "Mariology" By: erlenmeyer71 (04/02/2005 - 19:48)
- Genesis 3: Crux of Redemptive Messianism By: (02/02/2005 - 03:13)
- Seed of the woman By: Justin (02/02/2005 - 15:20)
- New Interpretation of Paul's Exegesis By: ericboehmer (02/02/2005 - 17:42)
- Narrative Multiverse & polyacoustic hearing By: andrewduerr (04/02/2005 - 06:46)
- Paul and the seed By: Justin (03/02/2005 - 04:40)
- Curiouser and curiouser By: peter wilkinson (02/02/2005 - 16:23)
- New Interpretation of Paul's Exegesis By: ericboehmer (02/02/2005 - 17:42)
- Seed of the woman By: Justin (02/02/2005 - 15:20)
- The woman and the dragon By: andrew (31/01/2005 - 23:28)
- Re: The woman and the dragon By: (22/02/2006 - 09:50)
- The serpent was really Adam? By: andrew (22/02/2006 - 11:45)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: Lloyd Dale (23/02/2006 - 07:43)
- The serpent was really Apep? By: erlenmeyer71 (23/02/2006 - 19:35)
- Re: The serpent was really Apep? By: Lloyd Dale (27/02/2006 - 07:28)
- Keys to Interpretation By: erlenmeyer71 (28/02/2006 - 23:58)
- Re: The serpent was really Apep? By: danutz (23/02/2006 - 20:46)
- Re: The serpent was really Apep? By: Lloyd Dale (27/02/2006 - 07:28)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: (23/02/2006 - 14:26)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: (24/02/2006 - 07:29)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: deacon (24/02/2006 - 17:20)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: Lloyd Dale (25/02/2006 - 07:24)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: deacon (25/02/2006 - 17:51)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: Lloyd Dale (27/02/2006 - 01:16)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: Daniel D. Farmer (27/02/2006 - 02:56)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: (27/02/2006 - 09:00)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: deacon (27/02/2006 - 21:50)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: Lloyd Dale (01/03/2006 - 06:43)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: Daniel D. Farmer (01/03/2006 - 16:18)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam - demons By: Lloyd Dale (01/03/2006 - 19:12)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam - demons By: deacon (01/03/2006 - 22:35)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam - demons By: Lloyd Dale (04/03/2006 - 01:29)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam - demons By: deacon (04/03/2006 - 19:26)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam - demons By: Lloyd Dale (04/03/2006 - 01:29)
- Demons and benefits By: Daniel D. Farmer (01/03/2006 - 19:29)
- Re: Demons and benefits By: Lloyd Dale (01/03/2006 - 21:39)
- Re: Demons and benefits By: gdargan (01/03/2006 - 23:18)
- Re: Demons and benefits By: Lloyd Dale (04/03/2006 - 08:01)
- Re: Demons and benefits By: Daniel D. Farmer (01/03/2006 - 22:43)
- Re: Demons and benefits By: Lloyd Dale (03/03/2006 - 09:33)
- Re: Demons and benefits By: gdargan (01/03/2006 - 23:18)
- Re: Demons and benefits By: Lloyd Dale (01/03/2006 - 21:39)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam - demons By: deacon (01/03/2006 - 22:35)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam - demons By: Lloyd Dale (01/03/2006 - 19:12)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: Daniel D. Farmer (01/03/2006 - 16:18)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: Lloyd Dale (01/03/2006 - 06:43)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: deacon (27/02/2006 - 21:50)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: (27/02/2006 - 09:00)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: Daniel D. Farmer (27/02/2006 - 02:56)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: Lloyd Dale (27/02/2006 - 01:16)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: deacon (25/02/2006 - 17:51)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: Lloyd Dale (25/02/2006 - 07:24)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: deacon (24/02/2006 - 17:20)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: (24/02/2006 - 07:29)
- The serpent was really Apep? By: erlenmeyer71 (23/02/2006 - 19:35)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: Lloyd Dale (23/02/2006 - 07:43)
- The serpent was really Adam? By: andrew (22/02/2006 - 11:45)
- Rabbit holes and spacious vistas By: peter wilkinson (01/02/2005 - 12:31)
- Down, down, down By: andrew (01/02/2005 - 14:03)
- Messianic prophecy in Genesis 3? By: peter wilkinson (01/02/2005 - 20:35)
- Snaking our way through the Old Testament By: andrew (04/02/2005 - 12:08)
- yeah but no but By: peter wilkinson (04/02/2005 - 14:43)
- Early Messanic Texts By: Alario (02/02/2005 - 00:25)
- Snaking our way through the Old Testament By: andrew (04/02/2005 - 12:08)
- This one will run and run By: peter wilkinson (01/02/2005 - 14:31)
- Messianic prophecy in Genesis 3? By: peter wilkinson (01/02/2005 - 20:35)
- Down, down, down By: andrew (01/02/2005 - 14:03)
- Re: The woman and the dragon By: (22/02/2006 - 09:50)
Re: very apocryphal references
When Christianity spread out from Jerusalem, the first place they went to were the Jewish communities throughout the Roman and Persian (Parthian) empires. Judaism was not limited to Judea and Galilee.
Even if some of the legend of ‘lost tribes’ are true they have no bearing on this discussion as they had no contact with the writers and theologians of the early church and could not give them an authentic perspective on the language and culture of the bible.
Deacon