Re: very apocryphal references
Revelation 12 | Marian Significance By: Ivan Latham (68 replies) 22 January, 2005 - 08:18
- Scriptural Censorship By: Ivan Latham (11/02/2005 - 05:25)
- canon fodder By: deacon (11/02/2005 - 21:00)
- very apocryphal references By: deacon (17/02/2005 - 19:06)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: Lloyd Dale (22/02/2006 - 08:24)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: deacon (23/02/2006 - 16:37)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: Lloyd Dale (23/02/2006 - 18:40)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: deacon (23/02/2006 - 20:44)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: Lloyd Dale (24/02/2006 - 06:45)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: deacon (24/02/2006 - 12:41)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: Lloyd Dale (27/02/2006 - 00:09)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: Lloyd Dale (24/02/2006 - 18:45)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: peter wilkinson (24/02/2006 - 19:51)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: Lloyd Dale (27/02/2006 - 00:53)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: peter wilkinson (27/02/2006 - 10:49)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: Lloyd Dale (28/02/2006 - 23:01)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: peter wilkinson (27/02/2006 - 10:49)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: Lloyd Dale (27/02/2006 - 00:53)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: peter wilkinson (24/02/2006 - 19:51)
- Re: the question of Mary By: Albannach (24/02/2006 - 15:21)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: deacon (24/02/2006 - 12:41)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: Lloyd Dale (24/02/2006 - 06:45)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: deacon (23/02/2006 - 20:44)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: Lloyd Dale (23/02/2006 - 18:40)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: deacon (23/02/2006 - 16:37)
- Re: very apocryphal references By: Lloyd Dale (22/02/2006 - 08:24)
- NT 'Apocryphal' References By: Ivan Latham (16/02/2005 - 05:08)
- very apocryphal references By: deacon (17/02/2005 - 19:06)
- Hebrew Bible By: lindellk (11/02/2005 - 21:00)
- canon fodder By: deacon (11/02/2005 - 21:00)
- The traditions of men By: deacon (11/02/2005 - 02:25)
- Sacrificial Mediation By: Ivan Latham (10/02/2005 - 13:14)
- Intercessory prayer By: erlenmeyer71 (10/02/2005 - 17:14)
- Testimony of Tradition By: Ivan Latham (10/02/2005 - 05:58)
- Tradition By: erlenmeyer71 (10/02/2005 - 07:18)
- NT Basis for Marian Intercession By: Ivan Latham (05/02/2005 - 10:41)
- whatever By: deacon (05/02/2005 - 12:28)
- Rev 12 and "Mariology" By: erlenmeyer71 (04/02/2005 - 19:48)
- Genesis 3: Crux of Redemptive Messianism By: (02/02/2005 - 03:13)
- Seed of the woman By: Justin (02/02/2005 - 15:20)
- New Interpretation of Paul's Exegesis By: ericboehmer (02/02/2005 - 17:42)
- Narrative Multiverse & polyacoustic hearing By: andrewduerr (04/02/2005 - 06:46)
- Paul and the seed By: Justin (03/02/2005 - 04:40)
- Curiouser and curiouser By: peter wilkinson (02/02/2005 - 16:23)
- New Interpretation of Paul's Exegesis By: ericboehmer (02/02/2005 - 17:42)
- Seed of the woman By: Justin (02/02/2005 - 15:20)
- The woman and the dragon By: andrew (31/01/2005 - 23:28)
- Re: The woman and the dragon By: (22/02/2006 - 09:50)
- The serpent was really Adam? By: andrew (22/02/2006 - 11:45)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: Lloyd Dale (23/02/2006 - 07:43)
- The serpent was really Apep? By: erlenmeyer71 (23/02/2006 - 19:35)
- Re: The serpent was really Apep? By: Lloyd Dale (27/02/2006 - 07:28)
- Keys to Interpretation By: erlenmeyer71 (28/02/2006 - 23:58)
- Re: The serpent was really Apep? By: danutz (23/02/2006 - 20:46)
- Re: The serpent was really Apep? By: Lloyd Dale (27/02/2006 - 07:28)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: (23/02/2006 - 14:26)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: (24/02/2006 - 07:29)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: deacon (24/02/2006 - 17:20)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: Lloyd Dale (25/02/2006 - 07:24)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: deacon (25/02/2006 - 17:51)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: Lloyd Dale (27/02/2006 - 01:16)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: Daniel D. Farmer (27/02/2006 - 02:56)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: (27/02/2006 - 09:00)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: deacon (27/02/2006 - 21:50)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: Lloyd Dale (01/03/2006 - 06:43)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: Daniel D. Farmer (01/03/2006 - 16:18)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam - demons By: Lloyd Dale (01/03/2006 - 19:12)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam - demons By: deacon (01/03/2006 - 22:35)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam - demons By: Lloyd Dale (04/03/2006 - 01:29)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam - demons By: deacon (04/03/2006 - 19:26)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam - demons By: Lloyd Dale (04/03/2006 - 01:29)
- Demons and benefits By: Daniel D. Farmer (01/03/2006 - 19:29)
- Re: Demons and benefits By: Lloyd Dale (01/03/2006 - 21:39)
- Re: Demons and benefits By: gdargan (01/03/2006 - 23:18)
- Re: Demons and benefits By: Lloyd Dale (04/03/2006 - 08:01)
- Re: Demons and benefits By: Daniel D. Farmer (01/03/2006 - 22:43)
- Re: Demons and benefits By: Lloyd Dale (03/03/2006 - 09:33)
- Re: Demons and benefits By: gdargan (01/03/2006 - 23:18)
- Re: Demons and benefits By: Lloyd Dale (01/03/2006 - 21:39)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam - demons By: deacon (01/03/2006 - 22:35)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam - demons By: Lloyd Dale (01/03/2006 - 19:12)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: Daniel D. Farmer (01/03/2006 - 16:18)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: Lloyd Dale (01/03/2006 - 06:43)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: deacon (27/02/2006 - 21:50)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: (27/02/2006 - 09:00)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: Daniel D. Farmer (27/02/2006 - 02:56)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: Lloyd Dale (27/02/2006 - 01:16)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: deacon (25/02/2006 - 17:51)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: Lloyd Dale (25/02/2006 - 07:24)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: deacon (24/02/2006 - 17:20)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: (24/02/2006 - 07:29)
- The serpent was really Apep? By: erlenmeyer71 (23/02/2006 - 19:35)
- Re: The serpent was really Adam? By: Lloyd Dale (23/02/2006 - 07:43)
- The serpent was really Adam? By: andrew (22/02/2006 - 11:45)
- Rabbit holes and spacious vistas By: peter wilkinson (01/02/2005 - 12:31)
- Down, down, down By: andrew (01/02/2005 - 14:03)
- Messianic prophecy in Genesis 3? By: peter wilkinson (01/02/2005 - 20:35)
- Snaking our way through the Old Testament By: andrew (04/02/2005 - 12:08)
- yeah but no but By: peter wilkinson (04/02/2005 - 14:43)
- Early Messanic Texts By: Alario (02/02/2005 - 00:25)
- Snaking our way through the Old Testament By: andrew (04/02/2005 - 12:08)
- This one will run and run By: peter wilkinson (01/02/2005 - 14:31)
- Messianic prophecy in Genesis 3? By: peter wilkinson (01/02/2005 - 20:35)
- Down, down, down By: andrew (01/02/2005 - 14:03)
- Re: The woman and the dragon By: (22/02/2006 - 09:50)
Re: very apocryphal references
The word Jewish is broader then its etymological roots, the same as ‘English’ does not simply mean some one who is genetically an Angle, it includes descendants of Angles, Saxon, Jutes, Celts, Normans, Danes and all who share the same culture and language.
So for example Leonard Cohen is described as ‘Jewish’ even though his name would suggest he is descended from a priest, the tribe of Levi. While the term Jewish derives from Judea and the tribe of Judah, it is used to describe the culture, people and religion that has come down from the children of Israel.
For Gentile Christians, these are the people and culture of our messiah and our scriptures. While most of the epistles were written to Gentiles the cultural context of the rest was lost to Christianity after the first century when its leadership and theologians were all Gentiles with little contact with Judaism (there’s that word again) and who had an animosity and mistrust toward the Rabbinical learning that could supply the context they lost.
Deacon.