Thank you Mr. Vaduva, 

Again, you use terms like "we" as if you & those following you are the face & voice of preterism.  The approach that I outlined could not have been taken as extreme fundamentalism or otherwise since I merely used a term like "solidly biblical" — is being solidly biblical equated with "extreme fundamentalism" in your eyes?  I think you make my point well — that some preterists (mainly under your direction) are moving away from a bible focus & more & more into ambiguity. And that by using terms like "we" you show you still think of yourself as THE voice & face of preterism.  Please refrain from this behavior.

Lastly, I find it ironic that you can actually label any preterist an "extreme fundamentalist" — how in the world did an "extreme fundamentalist" come to this eschatological paradigm?  Your logic fails to make sense.

On a positive note, I will no longer address Mr. Vaduva on this site.  My discussion is with others here.

Thank you for your time & consideration.

In Christ, (if that is not too "extremely fundamentalist" to say anymore)

Roderick
 

www.thekingdomcome.com