Daniel,

I just noticed your comment here about the systematic aspects of preterism.  Ironically, some believe that it is not systematic enough.  May I ask what aspects you see as systematic or fundamentalist within Preterism?  And I am also curious to get your feeling on whether or not you see a need for fundamentals in the emergent conversation at all?  Are there any non-negotiables at all, or anything goes?  

- virgil