Re: Impasse
Jesus is not God Almighty By: Theocrat (57 replies) 5 September, 2005 - 13:01
- Re: Jesus is not God Almighty By: PastorKG (05/02/2010 - 01:43)
- Re: Jesus is not God Almighty By: larry91403 (31/01/2010 - 11:08)
- Re: Jesus is not God Almighty By: The world has moved on. (30/01/2010 - 05:48)
- Re: Jesus is not God Almighty By: DoubtingFaith (26/09/2009 - 21:42)
- Re: Jesus is not God Almighty By: PastorKG (28/10/2009 - 17:36)
- Re: Jesus is not God Almighty By: PastorKG (20/08/2009 - 01:03)
- Re: Jesus is not God Almighty By: DoubtingFaith (27/09/2009 - 02:14)
- Re: Jesus is not God Almighty By: Servetus the Evangelical (03/08/2009 - 06:01)
- Re: Jesus is not God Almighty By: kimded (22/12/2007 - 20:13)
- "And the Word was God" By: smccloud (23/09/2005 - 22:16)
- Back in the saddle By: (05/10/2005 - 16:40)
- A positive contribution By: Theocrat (05/10/2005 - 16:44)
- A higher estimation By: (05/10/2005 - 16:51)
- Pre-incarnate existence By: phil (07/10/2005 - 14:35)
- sent into the world By: (07/10/2005 - 17:56)
- Shaliach By: phil (14/12/2005 - 18:51)
- Re: Shaliach By: Theocrat (10/01/2006 - 13:25)
- Impasse By: phil (13/01/2006 - 13:35)
- Re: Impasse By: Theocrat (16/01/2006 - 14:22)
- Re: Impasse By: unitarian (06/01/2007 - 08:06)
- Re: Impasse By: Theocrat (03/05/2007 - 17:01)
- Re: Impasse By: unitarian (06/01/2007 - 08:06)
- Re: Impasse By: larry91403 (13/01/2006 - 22:57)
- Re: Impasse By: Theocrat (16/01/2006 - 14:22)
- Re: Shaliach By: peter wilkinson (10/01/2006 - 15:07)
- Re: Shaliach By: Theocrat (16/01/2006 - 14:19)
- Re: Shaliach By: peter wilkinson (16/01/2006 - 15:57)
- Re: Shaliach By: Theocrat (16/01/2006 - 14:19)
- Impasse By: phil (13/01/2006 - 13:35)
- Re: Shaliach By: Theocrat (10/01/2006 - 13:25)
- Shaliach By: phil (14/12/2005 - 18:51)
- sent into the world By: (07/10/2005 - 17:56)
- Pre-incarnate existence By: phil (07/10/2005 - 14:35)
- A higher estimation By: (05/10/2005 - 16:51)
- A positive contribution By: Theocrat (05/10/2005 - 16:44)
- Back in the saddle By: (05/10/2005 - 16:40)
- Divinity of the Son By: RickRitchie (23/09/2005 - 20:23)
- Jesus is God Almighty (but that's a phrase I have never used) By: peter wilkinson (05/09/2005 - 18:54)
- That's the point By: Pluralist (05/09/2005 - 22:38)
- The gospel according to Pluralist By: peter wilkinson (06/09/2005 - 08:16)
- Response to Peter By: Theocrat (09/09/2005 - 13:02)
- I don't get your drift, By: peter wilkinson (09/09/2005 - 13:19)
- Sorry, Peter By: Theocrat (09/09/2005 - 13:42)
- Gulp! By: peter wilkinson (09/09/2005 - 19:29)
- More data to consider By: phil (12/09/2005 - 14:32)
- Soon come By: Theocrat (14/09/2005 - 16:46)
- Old chestnut By: Theocrat (15/09/2005 - 16:02)
- Hot chestnuts By: peter wilkinson (15/09/2005 - 19:47)
- a slightly different approach offered By: (18/09/2005 - 18:39)
- A different approach considered By: peter wilkinson (19/09/2005 - 10:34)
- different approach qualified By: paulchen (20/09/2005 - 22:55)
- man, water, day, god By: phil (21/09/2005 - 13:10)
- He was God enough... By: (23/09/2005 - 11:59)
- "A text cannot mean what it never meant" By: mars-hill (23/09/2005 - 13:28)
- He was God enough... By: (23/09/2005 - 11:59)
- A short response to a long post By: peter wilkinson (21/09/2005 - 00:18)
- sorry for delay, Peter, Phil... By: paulchen (24/09/2005 - 17:58)
- man, water, day, god By: phil (21/09/2005 - 13:10)
- Setting the record straight By: Theocrat (19/09/2005 - 15:20)
- Confused By: peter wilkinson (19/09/2005 - 15:56)
- different approach qualified By: paulchen (20/09/2005 - 22:55)
- A different approach considered By: peter wilkinson (19/09/2005 - 10:34)
- a slightly different approach offered By: (18/09/2005 - 18:39)
- Impersonal spirit By: Theocrat (15/09/2005 - 16:12)
- Not yet persuaded ... but please keep trying! By: phil (16/09/2005 - 15:38)
- Hot chestnuts By: peter wilkinson (15/09/2005 - 19:47)
- martian landscapes By: mars-hill (15/09/2005 - 01:53)
- Hey, you! By: (15/09/2005 - 15:59)
- Old chestnut By: Theocrat (15/09/2005 - 16:02)
- Soon come By: Theocrat (14/09/2005 - 16:46)
- More data to consider By: phil (12/09/2005 - 14:32)
- Startling claims By: phil (09/09/2005 - 14:59)
- Thou saist By: Theocrat (09/09/2005 - 16:24)
- Non-divine man left hanging By: mars-hill (13/09/2005 - 14:19)
- Hanging By: Pluralist (13/09/2005 - 21:49)
- In pursuit of a goal By: peter wilkinson (14/09/2005 - 08:46)
- Hanging By: Pluralist (13/09/2005 - 21:49)
- Non-divine man left hanging By: mars-hill (13/09/2005 - 14:19)
- Thou saist By: Theocrat (09/09/2005 - 16:24)
- Gulp! By: peter wilkinson (09/09/2005 - 19:29)
- Sorry, Peter By: Theocrat (09/09/2005 - 13:42)
- I don't get your drift, By: peter wilkinson (09/09/2005 - 13:19)
- Response to Peter By: Theocrat (09/09/2005 - 13:02)
- The gospel according to Pluralist By: peter wilkinson (06/09/2005 - 08:16)
- That's the point By: Pluralist (05/09/2005 - 22:38)
- cause for celebration By: Albannach (05/09/2005 - 14:44)
Re: Impasse
Phil
**********However, the incarnation and sacrificial death of Jesus of Nazareth was initiated jointly by God the Father and Jesus himself.**********
I see the point you’re making here. I suppose I would say that the initiative comes from both in different ways. From the Father, in terms of purpose and from Jesus, in his obedient response to the Father’s plan.
‘If it be possible, let this cup pass from me…’ the Son seems to be seeking some kind of alternative route here. What man would want to be tortured to death if there was potentially another option? But the blueprint is in God’s hand.
‘Nevertheless, not my will but your will be done’, seems to be a case of two conflicting wills, one of which was submitted to the other, as opposed to the Father and Son either sharing one will, or else having two wills in harmony. It is in this act of obedience that Jesus shows supreme grace in dying for his friends (and enemies). For that he deserves to be praised.
Apropos this, I plan to deal with this whole issue of obedience in another post. I’m going to have a stab at a narrative approach, as suggested by an earlier discussion with Peter and some observations made by Andrew regarding my dialogue with him.
I hope this will prove a fruitful way forward.
Theocrat