Just error by another name...?
Just error by another name...?
The trouble is, Andew, that however you define the Emerging Church — whether as a separate movement, or a trans-denominational ‘rethink’, it is abundantly clear that it is intent on scratching out 2000 years of traditional belief and understanding of the Scriptures. Like Maria von Trapp, the E/C wants to start at the very beginning, which is indeed a very good place to start, but this ‘review’ wishes to lock NT teaching into a pre-AD70 only relevance — at least if the E/C is to be judged by contributions to this site. This leaves what for AD 2005? I know I have beaten this drum before, forgive me, but where is your certainty? What can the E/C offer a dying world beyond some kind of temporal Liberation Theology? St Paul declared that he knew whom he had believed — but can the E/C ever utter the same cry?
- Re: Some thoughts on the definition of 'emerging church' By: (20/12/2005 - 05:01)
- Re: Some thoughts on the definition of 'emerging church' By: (19/12/2005 - 17:11)
- Re: ignoring 2000 years of traditional belief By: The Dave (18/12/2005 - 04:59)
- Re: Some thoughts on the definition of 'emerging church' By: PastorPete (16/12/2005 - 16:58)
- linking to the apostolic / early church By: john (16/12/2005 - 14:28)
- Re: Some thoughts on the definition of 'emerging church' By: (16/12/2005 - 14:23)
- Just error by another name...? By: Ivan Latham (16/12/2005 - 08:04)
- Re: Just error by another name...? By: andrew (16/12/2005 - 11:28)

Contradictions in the Gospels: Problems or Opportunities?
Day One: A Sir Toby's Creation Myth
A Generous Orthdoxy - Brian McLaren
The Lost World of Genesis One - John H. Walton