All comments

A non-believer's lament...

Tim: Re: A non-believer's... (2 days ago)
Jacob: Re: A non-believer's... (2 days ago)
Tim: Re: A non-believer's... (2 days ago)
Jacob: Re: A non-believer's... (2 days ago)
Tim: Re: A non-believer's... (3 days ago)
john doyle: Re: A non-believer's... (3 days ago)
Jacob: Re: A non-believer's... (3 days ago)
john doyle: Re: A non-believer's... (3 days ago)

The Lost World of Genesis One - John H. Walton

john doyle: Re: Proposition 2: Ancient... (3 days ago)
john doyle: Proposition 2: Ancient... (3 days ago)
Syndicate content

consequence, or correlation

consequence, or correlation

Hi, Andrew. I don’t want to detract from the main intent of your post, which is worth considering. However, I do want indicate a point of distinction between what the article you quote *says* and your own summary. The author merely stated a correlation between the societal evils and creationist beliefs. You seem to make a causal link.

I have yet to read Paul’s entire paper, but I would find it interesting to discover how he categorized belief, which could skey polling questions, etc. In this excerpt, he seems to link "worship of a creator" with "anti-evolution", thereby making a huge assumption that overlooks an entire other category that both worships the creator and has no scruples with evolutionary theory.

Good to be back. Sorry to be brief.

Is religion any good? By: Andrew (13 replies) 12 October, 2005 - 10:52