"And the Word was God"
Jesus is not God Almighty By: Theocrat (57 replies) 5 September, 2005 - 13:01
- Re: Jesus is not God Almighty By: PastorKG (05/02/2010 - 01:43)
- Re: Jesus is not God Almighty By: larry91403 (31/01/2010 - 11:08)
- Re: Jesus is not God Almighty By: The world has moved on. (30/01/2010 - 05:48)
- Re: Jesus is not God Almighty By: DoubtingFaith (26/09/2009 - 21:42)
- Re: Jesus is not God Almighty By: PastorKG (28/10/2009 - 17:36)
- Re: Jesus is not God Almighty By: PastorKG (20/08/2009 - 01:03)
- Re: Jesus is not God Almighty By: DoubtingFaith (27/09/2009 - 02:14)
- Re: Jesus is not God Almighty By: Servetus the Evangelical (03/08/2009 - 06:01)
- Re: Jesus is not God Almighty By: kimded (22/12/2007 - 20:13)
- "And the Word was God" By: smccloud (23/09/2005 - 22:16)
- Back in the saddle By: (05/10/2005 - 16:40)
- A positive contribution By: Theocrat (05/10/2005 - 16:44)
- A higher estimation By: (05/10/2005 - 16:51)
- Pre-incarnate existence By: phil (07/10/2005 - 14:35)
- sent into the world By: (07/10/2005 - 17:56)
- Shaliach By: phil (14/12/2005 - 18:51)
- Re: Shaliach By: Theocrat (10/01/2006 - 13:25)
- Impasse By: phil (13/01/2006 - 13:35)
- Re: Impasse By: Theocrat (16/01/2006 - 14:22)
- Re: Impasse By: unitarian (06/01/2007 - 08:06)
- Re: Impasse By: Theocrat (03/05/2007 - 17:01)
- Re: Impasse By: unitarian (06/01/2007 - 08:06)
- Re: Impasse By: larry91403 (13/01/2006 - 22:57)
- Re: Impasse By: Theocrat (16/01/2006 - 14:22)
- Re: Shaliach By: peter wilkinson (10/01/2006 - 15:07)
- Re: Shaliach By: Theocrat (16/01/2006 - 14:19)
- Re: Shaliach By: peter wilkinson (16/01/2006 - 15:57)
- Re: Shaliach By: Theocrat (16/01/2006 - 14:19)
- Impasse By: phil (13/01/2006 - 13:35)
- Re: Shaliach By: Theocrat (10/01/2006 - 13:25)
- Shaliach By: phil (14/12/2005 - 18:51)
- sent into the world By: (07/10/2005 - 17:56)
- Pre-incarnate existence By: phil (07/10/2005 - 14:35)
- A higher estimation By: (05/10/2005 - 16:51)
- A positive contribution By: Theocrat (05/10/2005 - 16:44)
- Back in the saddle By: (05/10/2005 - 16:40)
- Divinity of the Son By: RickRitchie (23/09/2005 - 20:23)
- Jesus is God Almighty (but that's a phrase I have never used) By: peter wilkinson (05/09/2005 - 18:54)
- That's the point By: Pluralist (05/09/2005 - 22:38)
- The gospel according to Pluralist By: peter wilkinson (06/09/2005 - 08:16)
- Response to Peter By: Theocrat (09/09/2005 - 13:02)
- I don't get your drift, By: peter wilkinson (09/09/2005 - 13:19)
- Sorry, Peter By: Theocrat (09/09/2005 - 13:42)
- Gulp! By: peter wilkinson (09/09/2005 - 19:29)
- More data to consider By: phil (12/09/2005 - 14:32)
- Soon come By: Theocrat (14/09/2005 - 16:46)
- Old chestnut By: Theocrat (15/09/2005 - 16:02)
- Hot chestnuts By: peter wilkinson (15/09/2005 - 19:47)
- a slightly different approach offered By: (18/09/2005 - 18:39)
- A different approach considered By: peter wilkinson (19/09/2005 - 10:34)
- different approach qualified By: paulchen (20/09/2005 - 22:55)
- man, water, day, god By: phil (21/09/2005 - 13:10)
- He was God enough... By: (23/09/2005 - 11:59)
- "A text cannot mean what it never meant" By: mars-hill (23/09/2005 - 13:28)
- He was God enough... By: (23/09/2005 - 11:59)
- A short response to a long post By: peter wilkinson (21/09/2005 - 00:18)
- sorry for delay, Peter, Phil... By: paulchen (24/09/2005 - 17:58)
- man, water, day, god By: phil (21/09/2005 - 13:10)
- Setting the record straight By: Theocrat (19/09/2005 - 15:20)
- Confused By: peter wilkinson (19/09/2005 - 15:56)
- different approach qualified By: paulchen (20/09/2005 - 22:55)
- A different approach considered By: peter wilkinson (19/09/2005 - 10:34)
- a slightly different approach offered By: (18/09/2005 - 18:39)
- Impersonal spirit By: Theocrat (15/09/2005 - 16:12)
- Not yet persuaded ... but please keep trying! By: phil (16/09/2005 - 15:38)
- Hot chestnuts By: peter wilkinson (15/09/2005 - 19:47)
- martian landscapes By: mars-hill (15/09/2005 - 01:53)
- Hey, you! By: (15/09/2005 - 15:59)
- Old chestnut By: Theocrat (15/09/2005 - 16:02)
- Soon come By: Theocrat (14/09/2005 - 16:46)
- More data to consider By: phil (12/09/2005 - 14:32)
- Startling claims By: phil (09/09/2005 - 14:59)
- Thou saist By: Theocrat (09/09/2005 - 16:24)
- Non-divine man left hanging By: mars-hill (13/09/2005 - 14:19)
- Hanging By: Pluralist (13/09/2005 - 21:49)
- In pursuit of a goal By: peter wilkinson (14/09/2005 - 08:46)
- Hanging By: Pluralist (13/09/2005 - 21:49)
- Non-divine man left hanging By: mars-hill (13/09/2005 - 14:19)
- Thou saist By: Theocrat (09/09/2005 - 16:24)
- Gulp! By: peter wilkinson (09/09/2005 - 19:29)
- Sorry, Peter By: Theocrat (09/09/2005 - 13:42)
- I don't get your drift, By: peter wilkinson (09/09/2005 - 13:19)
- Response to Peter By: Theocrat (09/09/2005 - 13:02)
- The gospel according to Pluralist By: peter wilkinson (06/09/2005 - 08:16)
- That's the point By: Pluralist (05/09/2005 - 22:38)
- cause for celebration By: Albannach (05/09/2005 - 14:44)
"And the Word was God"
In all this discussion there has been no reference to John 1:1-3 and John 1:14 except by RickRichie. To me John, as an apostle, is saying that this man Jesus was the incarnate Word of God and that the Word of God was in fact God.
Too bad there isn’t a good font on the web for Greek in these postings.
My question would be, How do you read “Theos en hoLogos”? and how does that statement relate to the declarations Paul makes in so many of his epistles that reference God the Father and His Son?
Blessings to you all.