up to a point
Virgin birth & the line of David. By: liquidlight (21 replies) 14 September, 2005 - 11:26
- Re: Virgin birth & the line of David. By: regg (05/01/2010 - 14:10)
- Virgin birth posts By: andrew (14/09/2005 - 12:14)
- up to a point By: (14/09/2005 - 12:47)
- Immaculate assumptions By: peter wilkinson (14/09/2005 - 13:37)
- Does this make sense? By: (14/09/2005 - 16:43)
- No By: Pluralist (15/09/2005 - 00:00)
- genealogies. By: (15/09/2005 - 09:41)
- Proof By: Pluralist (25/09/2005 - 03:28)
- backing up. By: mutant (26/09/2005 - 10:42)
- Thoughts on Jesus; ancestry and the Virginal Conception By: Stuart (21/09/2005 - 00:23)
- Descendant By: Pluralist (22/09/2005 - 01:05)
- The point is not whether By: Stuart (24/09/2005 - 04:31)
- Why? By: Pluralist (25/09/2005 - 03:36)
- fundamental antitheses By: (25/09/2005 - 13:11)
- Soteriology By: Pluralist (27/09/2005 - 03:24)
- foundation. By: (27/09/2005 - 11:27)
- Soteriology By: Pluralist (27/09/2005 - 03:24)
- fundamental antitheses By: (25/09/2005 - 13:11)
- Why? By: Pluralist (25/09/2005 - 03:36)
- Tormenting the evangelicals By: peter wilkinson (23/09/2005 - 12:55)
- emergent sans prozac By: mutant (23/09/2005 - 13:02)
- mmm, a short post that By: (22/09/2005 - 11:00)
- The point is not whether By: Stuart (24/09/2005 - 04:31)
- Jesus Ancestry By: (21/09/2005 - 03:03)
- Descendant By: Pluralist (22/09/2005 - 01:05)
- Proof By: Pluralist (25/09/2005 - 03:28)
- Genealogies By: peter wilkinson (15/09/2005 - 08:55)
- genealogies. By: (15/09/2005 - 09:41)
- No By: Pluralist (15/09/2005 - 00:00)
- Does this make sense? By: (14/09/2005 - 16:43)
- Immaculate assumptions By: peter wilkinson (14/09/2005 - 13:37)
- up to a point By: (14/09/2005 - 12:47)
up to a point
Andrew, thanks. this is useful up to a point, especially where you state: "The idea of incarnation does not require a virgin birth; nor did the story of the virgin birth arise out of belief in the incarnation."
interestingly you also state that an immaculate conception was not needed in order for Jesus to be sinless. i’m not closed to this possibility, even though it goes against the mainstream teaching that He had to be born of a virgin due to sin coming through the seed of the father and the world in need of a sinless sacrifice for eternal atonement.
if Jesus had in fact been born of two biological parents - with no direct divine involvement - how would he have escaped the inheritance of sin?