Emerging theology , at least to my understanding from this site, seems to be both personal and dynamic. It rejects prescribed dogma so is therefore to some degree both a reform movement and a departure from evangelical thought.

Whether or not it is sub-biblical, sub-evangelical or sub-orthodox will, of course, depend on whose emerging theology you are speaking of and when you speak to them. I agree with del dominus that “emergents(?)” will eventually get to the same conclusion via a different route than evangelicals but only in some areas. I’m sure we are wrong about some points and there is lots of room for debate and disagreement about the gray areas. Is there a thread somewhere about what is essential and what isn’t?