The blessing of the nations
The blessing of the nations
I am not saying that there is no authentic blessing apart from incorporation into the people of God, merely that the particular blessing referred to in the Abrahamic covenant involves this. Acts 2:25-26 says that this blessing is fulfilled when people turn from their wicked ways; Galatians 3:8 says that "justification by faith" = the gospel (evangel) = "all nations blessed"; Galatians 3:29 identifies Abraham’s heirs according to this promise as those who are "in Christ". Expressions of our Christlike love, then, while blessings from God and in fulfillment of our Christian duty, do not constitute fulfillment of the promise to Abraham.
Chris, you may be right here. I agree that Paul takes ‘In you shall all the nations be blessed’ to mean that the Gentiles are blessed, and therefore the promise is fulfilled, through their participation in the Spirit (Gal.3:8, 14). It’s possible, then, that too much has been made of the argument from the Abrahamic covenant that to be a blessing to the nations means more than simply offering incorporation into the people of God - ie. blessing equals reconciliation with God through Christ.
Having said that, the Old Testament does not understand
the blessing of the nations through Abraham as incorporation into
Israel, and it may be that we need to set Paul’s particular argument in
the context of Galatians within a wider narrative framework. The
possibility of becoming a descendant of Abraham does not necessarily
exhaust the content of the promise that the nations would be blessed
through him. It is worth noting that one aspect of sowing to the Spirit
is doing good to all people, which is not limited to ‘those who
are of the household of faith’ (Gal.6:8-10). Clearly, doing good to
people entails more than preaching the gospel to them. The ‘priestly
nation’ motif and Old Testament eschatological themes which are picked
up in the New Testament (eg. Jesus’ images of a light and a city on a
hill) also need to be taken into account.
Acts 3:25-26 is less useful in this argument because it is
addressed to the house of Israel. It is not that the blessing of the
nations is fulfilled when people in general turn from their wicked ways
but that Israel will be blessed when the Jews repent. First, Israel
needs to be restored through repentance and so be blessed; then this
restored and refreshed people will be the means through which ‘all the
families of the earth’ shall be blessed, but how this is to happen is
not made explicit.
- Covenant again By: Chris (21/06/2005 - 09:06)
- Covenant and continuity By: andrew (21/06/2005 - 11:36)
- I understand a covenant to be By: Chris (22/06/2005 - 09:24)
- Continuity of purpose By: (22/06/2005 - 11:04)
- Same God, different covenant By: Chris (22/06/2005 - 18:30)
- I'll champion evangelism By: Chris (24/06/2005 - 16:34)
- Evangelism and doing good to all people By: peter wilkinson (25/06/2005 - 13:41)
- Relationship By: pastorerik (02/05/2006 - 21:23)
- Evangelism and doing good to all people By: peter wilkinson (25/06/2005 - 13:41)
- The blessing of the nations By: andrew (24/06/2005 - 11:32)
- Still a priestly nation By: (24/06/2005 - 00:34)
- Covenants, narratives and orthodoxy By: peter wilkinson (23/06/2005 - 12:41)
- Confrontational isn't bad By: (24/06/2005 - 00:26)
- I'll champion evangelism By: Chris (24/06/2005 - 16:34)
- Same God, different covenant By: Chris (22/06/2005 - 18:30)
- Continuity of purpose By: (22/06/2005 - 11:04)
- I understand a covenant to be By: Chris (22/06/2005 - 09:24)
- Covenant and continuity By: andrew (21/06/2005 - 11:36)
- Seperating reading from theology By: mars-hill (19/06/2005 - 12:01)
- another dichotomy that needs to go? By: (22/06/2005 - 13:42)
- dichotomy? By: mars-hill (23/06/2005 - 01:02)
- mars-hill, I disagree. Let By: (23/06/2005 - 18:20)
- reading and theology again By: mars-hill (24/06/2005 - 01:04)
- Perhaps a tool to clarify? By: Makaden (25/06/2005 - 00:01)
- yes! thanks By: mars-hill (25/06/2005 - 04:03)
- Perhaps a tool to clarify? By: Makaden (25/06/2005 - 00:01)
- reading and theology again By: mars-hill (24/06/2005 - 01:04)
- mars-hill, I disagree. Let By: (23/06/2005 - 18:20)
- dichotomy? By: mars-hill (23/06/2005 - 01:02)
- Story and theology By: andrew (20/06/2005 - 16:42)
- telling the story By: mars-hill (22/06/2005 - 01:15)
- another dichotomy that needs to go? By: (22/06/2005 - 13:42)
- brief thoughts- maybe more later By: orpheus42 (17/06/2005 - 20:37)
- Excellent By: andrew (17/06/2005 - 17:55)
- Narrative/historical interpretations - further discussion By: peter wilkinson (20/06/2005 - 10:26)
- Kingdom of God By: andrew (20/06/2005 - 16:19)
- Narrative/historical interpretations - further discussion By: peter wilkinson (20/06/2005 - 10:26)

Contradictions in the Gospels: Problems or Opportunities?
Day One: A Sir Toby's Creation Myth
A Generous Orthdoxy - Brian McLaren
The Lost World of Genesis One - John H. Walton