Confrontational isn't bad
Confrontational isn't bad
Around this sort of thinking emerges the idea of God’s people exercising a priestly role, in which God’s goodness is mediated to the world in less confrontational ways than those associated with evangelism (which sets up the us/them relationship).
Perhaps that needs clarifying a bit. The point is not so much to avoid being confrontational as simply to grasp the fact that there is far more to this priestly function than evangelism, converting people, saving souls. God has called a people into relationship with himself by grace - we have become reconciled to him. But he has done so for the sake of a priestly presence in the world. At times, no doubt, this presence will be confrontational, critical, dissident, difficult, cantakerous - why not? At times it will be healing, serving, upbuilding, creative, enlightening - at least, one sincerely hopes so. Would it make sense to see this priestly role as being the fulness of God for the world, embodying at least symbolically - as a prophetic sign - the full spectrum of the creator’s interest in his creation?
- Covenant again By: Chris (21/06/2005 - 09:06)
- Covenant and continuity By: andrew (21/06/2005 - 11:36)
- I understand a covenant to be By: Chris (22/06/2005 - 09:24)
- Continuity of purpose By: (22/06/2005 - 11:04)
- Same God, different covenant By: Chris (22/06/2005 - 18:30)
- I'll champion evangelism By: Chris (24/06/2005 - 16:34)
- Evangelism and doing good to all people By: peter wilkinson (25/06/2005 - 13:41)
- Relationship By: pastorerik (02/05/2006 - 21:23)
- Evangelism and doing good to all people By: peter wilkinson (25/06/2005 - 13:41)
- The blessing of the nations By: andrew (24/06/2005 - 11:32)
- Still a priestly nation By: (24/06/2005 - 00:34)
- Covenants, narratives and orthodoxy By: peter wilkinson (23/06/2005 - 12:41)
- Confrontational isn't bad By: (24/06/2005 - 00:26)
- I'll champion evangelism By: Chris (24/06/2005 - 16:34)
- Same God, different covenant By: Chris (22/06/2005 - 18:30)
- Continuity of purpose By: (22/06/2005 - 11:04)
- I understand a covenant to be By: Chris (22/06/2005 - 09:24)
- Covenant and continuity By: andrew (21/06/2005 - 11:36)
- Seperating reading from theology By: mars-hill (19/06/2005 - 12:01)
- another dichotomy that needs to go? By: (22/06/2005 - 13:42)
- dichotomy? By: mars-hill (23/06/2005 - 01:02)
- mars-hill, I disagree. Let By: (23/06/2005 - 18:20)
- reading and theology again By: mars-hill (24/06/2005 - 01:04)
- Perhaps a tool to clarify? By: Makaden (25/06/2005 - 00:01)
- yes! thanks By: mars-hill (25/06/2005 - 04:03)
- Perhaps a tool to clarify? By: Makaden (25/06/2005 - 00:01)
- reading and theology again By: mars-hill (24/06/2005 - 01:04)
- mars-hill, I disagree. Let By: (23/06/2005 - 18:20)
- dichotomy? By: mars-hill (23/06/2005 - 01:02)
- Story and theology By: andrew (20/06/2005 - 16:42)
- telling the story By: mars-hill (22/06/2005 - 01:15)
- another dichotomy that needs to go? By: (22/06/2005 - 13:42)
- brief thoughts- maybe more later By: orpheus42 (17/06/2005 - 20:37)
- Excellent By: andrew (17/06/2005 - 17:55)
- Narrative/historical interpretations - further discussion By: peter wilkinson (20/06/2005 - 10:26)
- Kingdom of God By: andrew (20/06/2005 - 16:19)
- Narrative/historical interpretations - further discussion By: peter wilkinson (20/06/2005 - 10:26)

Contradictions in the Gospels: Problems or Opportunities?
Day One: A Sir Toby's Creation Myth
A Generous Orthdoxy - Brian McLaren
The Lost World of Genesis One - John H. Walton