Yes, and to be blunt

Yes, and to be blunt

If I were God and I wanted people to be very clear about what is and is not sexually acceptable based on anatomy, I would have provided for women a sexual organ that did not double as the urinary pathway. But that’s just me.

I guess this argument sortof piggybacks on the reproductive argument. Sperm only belongs where the eggs are. I suppose ancient civilizations could put this together by noting that when they put their sperm in this place, a baby comes out, but when they put their sperm in other places, babies don’t come out.

Must have been an ugly trial-and-error phase to reach that conclusion!

Sorry, I’m digressing rapidly. Time to go do something else.

Homosexuality and new creation By: Andrew (54 replies) 4 April, 2005 - 12:40