All comments

Guerrilla Worship - Liverpool Flash Mob

The world has moved on.: Re: Guerrilla Worship -... (4 hours ago)

Why YOU Should Plant a Church

The world has moved on.: Re: Why YOU Should Plant a... (6 hours ago)

Contradictions in the Gospels: Problems or Opportunities?

Jacob: Re: Contradictions in the... (3 days ago)
Jacob: Re: Contradictions in the... (4 days ago)
peter wilkinson: Re: Contradictions in the... (4 days ago)

Day One: A Sir Toby's Creation Myth

john doyle: Re: Day One: A Sir Toby's... (4 days ago)

A Generous Orthdoxy - Brian McLaren

john doyle: Re: A Generous Orthdoxy - Brian... (4 days ago)

The Lost World of Genesis One - John H. Walton

john doyle: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (4 days ago)
peter wilkinson: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (4 days ago)
john doyle: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (5 days ago)
Syndicate content

Now, in order to conclude tha

Now, in order to conclude tha

Now, in order to conclude that Paul doesn’t like gay people, we must establish that Paul is in fact talking about the same people Plato is talking about here. Has anyone done that? I haven’t seen it. What I have seen is a possible demonstration that in at least one instance, Paul was talking about a specific political figure (Claudius) whose strange sexual practices included incest, rape, etc. I am no New Testament scholar, so I can’t pretend to have done the research into this, but the author of the article (the chaplain at my church) did.

So, until someone establishes that Paul is talking about ALL gay people in general, and not just making a political point, I don’t know if we can conclude that he’s talking about the same people Plato is here.

A committed monogamous homosexual versus a slave owner By: paulhartigan (45 replies) 6 March, 2005 - 21:02